Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort.
"Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan)" <moulchan@cisco.com> Tue, 09 June 2015 03:01 UTC
Return-Path: <moulchan@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4BF1A8A96 for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 20:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.81
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.81 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rJnct4d2ZAX9 for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 20:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91DB11A8A8C for <eman@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 20:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6913; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1433818914; x=1435028514; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=z7OtWwX0O5TARYPKc5lqF5HylCSmCYNFeRoLvB3nsTM=; b=TxAhC3IS+7i/T2l47usNVwnx8BCeFtalYCeNVEouHrhnfDgBd2dr/GdF vcqQZRa/ZT7ktE6I28qK9X4911rLqv5Rl42xOj/PqUbgVUQOEmc2gPC0G Ih47W0JWQ4NfENtEhcTBSPx59uXc/HH2gpTjYxFcHGMp/hOfIADE+PiUK E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BWBACEVnZV/4ENJK1cgkVLVF4GvWpmCYE6HQEJhXkCgTE4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQiAQEBAQMBAQFrCxACAQgOAwMBAigHJwsUCQgCBAENBQkLC4gPDc5XAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF4tDgj+CNg0EB4QtBZM8izCBMJJcg1kkYoMWb4FGgQEBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,577,1427760000"; d="scan'208,217";a="157473165"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Jun 2015 03:01:53 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t5931roP014800 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Jun 2015 03:01:53 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.8.191]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 22:01:53 -0500
From: "Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan)" <moulchan@cisco.com>
To: Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort.
Thread-Index: AQHQnbWPvOOoz6HyYES8AXbQhGrgzp2eub2AgAABvoCABXphAA==
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 03:01:52 +0000
Message-ID: <D19C53A1.43722%moulchan@cisco.com>
References: <556E820E.4040208@bogus.com> <55720A99.2030407@cisco.com> <944DE63C-1467-4EC2-976F-24C46588693F@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <944DE63C-1467-4EC2-976F-24C46588693F@lucidvision.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.1.150515
x-originating-ip: [10.65.46.94]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D19C53A143722moulchanciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eman/9oiA2HlXtSTDGrH7h8mcQymnU60>
Cc: eman mailing list <eman@ietf.org>, "eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort.
X-BeenThere: eman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the Energy Management Working Group <eman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eman/>
List-Post: <mailto:eman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 03:01:56 -0000
Thanks to all the WG chairs for shepherding the IETF drafts and taking them to a conclusion. I may not be able to travel to Prague. So, enjoy. Cheers Mouli From: Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com<mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com>> Date: Saturday, 6 June 2015 2:22 AM To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com<mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> Cc: eman mailing list <eman@ietf.org<mailto:eman@ietf.org>>, "eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org<mailto:eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" <eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org<mailto:eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Beers are on you! 8) On Jun 5, 2015:4:46 PM, at 4:46 PM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com<mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> wrote: Yes, thanks to the contributors, document editors, WG chairs, previous ADs :-), basically the entire EMAN community. Celebration in Prague? Fine with me. Regards, Benoit Greetings, Now that we've crossed the milstone of having draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-11 move to the RFC editor queue, I think we can pause and reflect on the effort that has completed. It took a while to get here and the consensus that we built was hard won but I hope durable. It's my intention to close down the working group, maintaining the mailing list for a time. The mailing list archive as with other IETF mailing lists will be preserved. in the immediate sense if there is work around the edges of this space we have the opsawg working group to support such activities. Thank you again for your diligent efforts, especially the present and former chairs who shepherded this work to the point that it is at now. Regards Joel _______________________________________________ eman mailing list eman@ietf.org<mailto:eman@ietf.org>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman _______________________________________________ eman mailing list eman@ietf.org<mailto:eman@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Juergen Schoenwaelder
- [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? joel jaeggli
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Alexandre Petrescu
- [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. joel jaeggli
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Nadeau Thomas
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. John Parello (jparello)
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Nadeau Thomas
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Benoit Claise
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Nadeau Thomas
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan)
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Benoit Claise
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Rolf Winter
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Andy Bierman
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Nadeau Thomas
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Rolf Winter
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Romascanu, Dan (Dan)