Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort.

"Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan)" <> Tue, 09 June 2015 03:01 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4BF1A8A96 for <>; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 20:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.81
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.81 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rJnct4d2ZAX9 for <>; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 20:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91DB11A8A8C for <>; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 20:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=6913; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1433818914; x=1435028514; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=z7OtWwX0O5TARYPKc5lqF5HylCSmCYNFeRoLvB3nsTM=; b=TxAhC3IS+7i/T2l47usNVwnx8BCeFtalYCeNVEouHrhnfDgBd2dr/GdF vcqQZRa/ZT7ktE6I28qK9X4911rLqv5Rl42xOj/PqUbgVUQOEmc2gPC0G Ih47W0JWQ4NfENtEhcTBSPx59uXc/HH2gpTjYxFcHGMp/hOfIADE+PiUK E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,577,1427760000"; d="scan'208,217";a="157473165"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 09 Jun 2015 03:01:53 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t5931roP014800 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Jun 2015 03:01:53 GMT
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 22:01:53 -0500
From: "Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan)" <>
To: Nadeau Thomas <>, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <>
Thread-Topic: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort.
Thread-Index: AQHQnbWPvOOoz6HyYES8AXbQhGrgzp2eub2AgAABvoCABXphAA==
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 03:01:52 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D19C53A143722moulchanciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Cc: eman mailing list <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort.
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the Energy Management Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 03:01:56 -0000

Thanks to all the WG chairs for shepherding the IETF drafts and taking them to a conclusion.
I may not be able to travel to Prague.  So, enjoy.


From: Nadeau Thomas <<>>
Date: Saturday, 6 June 2015 2:22 AM
To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <<>>
Cc: eman mailing list <<>>, "<>" <<>>
Subject: Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort.

Beers are on you! 8)

On Jun 5, 2015:4:46 PM, at 4:46 PM, Benoit Claise <<>> wrote:

Yes, thanks to the contributors, document editors, WG chairs, previous ADs :-), basically the entire EMAN community.
Celebration in Prague? Fine with me.

Regards, Benoit


Now that we've crossed the milstone of having
draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-11 move to the RFC editor queue,
I think we can pause and reflect on the effort that has completed. It
took a while to get here and the consensus that we built was hard won
but I hope durable.

It's my intention to close down the working group, maintaining the
mailing list for a time. The mailing list archive as with other IETF
mailing lists will be preserved. in the immediate sense if there is work
around the edges of this space we have the opsawg working group to
support such activities.

Thank you again for your diligent efforts, especially the present and
former chairs who shepherded this work to the point that it is at now.


eman mailing list<>

eman mailing list<>