Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB
Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 11 July 2016 15:17 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB13E12D51D
for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.353
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.353 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id LUUl22ejYuIF for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr
[132.167.192.142])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82E2F12D576
for <eman@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21])
by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id
u6BFHW7r025878; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 17:17:32 +0200
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2AAD20A32A;
Mon, 11 Jul 2016 17:17:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pisaure by pisaure with queue id 4705226-2;
Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:17:31 GMT
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7])
by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF9820A32A;
Mon, 11 Jul 2016 17:17:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184])
by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id
u6BFHVn9024594; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 17:17:31 +0200
To: eman@ietf.org,
"Plymoth Nilsson Anders (anders@telhoc.se)" <anders@telhoc.se>,
Erkki Harjula <erkkih@ee.oulu.fi>,
BEN HADJ SAID Siwar <SIWAR.BenHadjSaid@cea.fr>, bjorn.landfeldt@eit.lth.se
References: <dc75c6ae-8992-9f2b-9e0f-937eeb6bf54b@gmail.com>
<9494BFE6-4782-4B9B-B4BC-B9C474F1C93D@lucidvision.com>
<CADfatQ1_632NcmK9jZW9mc=fANEFnnFp2-q130ffZTavt+GsoQ@mail.gmail.com>
<34c7f0db-6547-add3-333d-9f390558d0d7@gmail.com>
<9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751F8C6D@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
<8fb2d1ec-4a69-42c4-0063-123ada215fc8@gmail.com>
<9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA7521DEAC@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
<1419b926-5bd8-fc70-669a-02d22091a431@bogus.com>
<6ae6e435-dfff-f058-446e-546ba11b9ddf@gmail.com>
<f9c37403-3996-c18b-d84e-ac4b59fecb5b@gmail.com>
<20160708123109.GA23658@elstar.local>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <c9e9ba01-81fa-2af2-d7d8-1dd30308bdf4@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 17:17:29 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160708123109.GA23658@elstar.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eman/JfzmQ91J9ab7mWONWUo2gD5vdXk>
Subject: Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB
X-BeenThere: eman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the Energy Management Working Group <eman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eman>,
<mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eman/>
List-Post: <mailto:eman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman>,
<mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:17:51 -0000
We will have to check this, but for now I must say I did not know that one could generate the YANG model simply by issuing that command. Quickly skimming through it seems that 'smidump -f yang BATTERY-MIB' would not add a contact address of the person who performed the translation. Alex Le 08/07/2016 à 14:31, Juergen Schoenwaelder a écrit : > Hi, > > how is this different from 'smidump -f yang BATTERY-MIB', which > implements the translation defined in RFC 6643? RFC 6643 was written > to avoid manual translations and having to republish MIB modules > > /js > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 02:24:34PM +0200, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: >> Hello, >> >> We have submitted a new draft describing a YANG model for the >> battery MIB: >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-petrescu-battery-mib-yang-00 >> >> How should we pursue this draft? >> >> Alex >> >> Le 06/07/2016 à 13:52, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit : >>> >>> >>> Le 30/06/2016 à 06:49, joel jaeggli a écrit : >>>> On 6/28/16 8:10 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: >>>>> Sure. But your two statements (in the first paragraph) use >>>>> each of the conditional 'may'. What is the reason to use YANG >>>>> on the devices? The SDN paradigm does not AFAIK make >>>>> assumptions about using a specific protocol or DML at the >>>>> device management level. YANG comes at a certain cost (bits >>>>> on wire, memory). Maybe this is affordable, or maybe YANG is >>>>> needed for other reasons, but this needs to be shown >>>>> explicitely. >>>> >>>> Signaling presumes in some utility is derived from >>>> coordination. >>>> >>>> If I have a ten year primary battery or I'm a space probe >>>> headed to alpha centuri I'm not going to devote a lot of >>>> electrons to expressing my power consumption or battery >>>> condition. >>>> >>>> More active or particularly coordinated groups of devices such >>>> as the elements of a BST or a datacenter might well have >>>> information to share. >>> >>> Whereas I can expect a BST (Base Station?) to be operated on >>> chemical battery in emergency areas, it would be hard to imagine >>> an entire datacenter on battery - wouldn't it rather be on >>> combustion-engine electricity generators? >>> >>> For the BST case: I will write separately. >>> >>> For the datacenter: I think there would be a need for an >>> entirely different MIB, different than a battery-MIB. >>> >>> Alex >>> >>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Dan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Alexandre Petrescu >>>>>> [mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June >>>>>> 28, 2016 5:55 PM To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Rolf Winter; >>>>>> Nadeau Thomas Cc: eman@ietf.org Subject: Re: [eman] >>>>>> energy-specific efforts at IETF? >>>>>> >>>>>> The SDN paradigm may be applied not just to switches but >>>>>> to smartphones. Further, a tool like CoMI (CoAP Management >>>>>> Interface) may make use of YANG models on IoT devices which >>>>>> are typically constrained on battery. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yesterday I read about an NB-IoT LPWA device from u-blox >>>>>> which runs on a battery for 10 years. >>>>>> >>>>>> Alex >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 02/06/2016 à 11:20, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) a écrit : >>>>>>> No, RFC 7577 defines an SMIv2 MIB. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Before engaging in a discussion about 'let us do EMAN >>>>>>> data modelling in YANG' I would like to see a use case - >>>>>>> i.e. an example of an energy monitoring system that uses >>>>>>> YANG for reporting energy information. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: eman >>>>>>>> [mailto:eman-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandre >>>>>>>> Petrescu Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 11:22 AM To: >>>>>>>> Rolf Winter; Nadeau Thomas Cc: eman@ietf.org Subject: >>>>>>>> Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le 02/06/2016 à 10:18, Rolf Winter a écrit : >>>>>>>>> Is there anything that the EMAN work is not >>>>>>>>> addressing or that requires new protocol work? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For my clarification - is the battery monitoring MIB >>>>>>>> RFC7577 using YANG? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Nadeau Thomas >>>>>>>> <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Not that I know of in the form of an official >>>>>>>>>> working group. EMAN was >>>>>>>> shut down something like a year ago. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --Tom >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 1, 2016:8:34 AM, at 8:34 AM, Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>> Petrescu >>>>>>>> <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Is there any other effort focusing on energy >>>>>>>>>>> consumption happening at >>>>>>>> IETF currently? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I am interested in aspects related to energy >>>>>>>>>>> consumption of IP networks >>>>>>>> used to deliver video streams. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yours, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Alex Petrescu >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Le 09/06/2015 à 05:01, Mouli Chandramouli >>>>>>>>>>> (moulchan) a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to all the WG chairs for shepherding the >>>>>>>>>>>> IETF drafts and taking them to a conclusion. I >>>>>>>>>>>> may not be able to travel to Prague. So, >>>>>>>>>>>> enjoy. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers Mouli >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com>> Date: >>>>>>>>>>>> Saturday, 6 June 2015 2:22 AM To: "Benoit >>>>>>>>>>>> Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> Cc: eman mailing >>>>>>>>>>>> list <eman@ietf.org <mailto:eman@ietf.org>>, >>>>>>>>>>>> "eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" >>>>>>>>>>>> <eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org>> Subject: >>>>>>>>>>>> Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Beers are on you! 8) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 5, 2015:4:46 PM, at 4:46 PM, Benoit >>>>>>>>>>>>> Claise <bclaise@cisco.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, thanks to the contributors, document >>>>>>>>>>>>> editors, WG chairs, previous ADs :-), >>>>>>>>>>>>> basically the entire EMAN community. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Celebration in Prague? Fine with me. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, Benoit >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Greetings, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now that we've crossed the milstone of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> having >>>>>>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-11 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> move to the RFC editor >>>>>>>> queue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we can pause and reflect on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort that has completed. >>>>>>>> It >>>>>>>>>>>>>> took a while to get here and the consensus >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that we built was hard >>>>>>>> won >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I hope durable. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's my intention to close down the working >>>>>>>>>>>>>> group, maintaining the mailing list for a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> time. The mailing list archive as with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> other IETF mailing lists will be preserved. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the immediate sense if there is >>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>>>>>>> around the edges of this space we have the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> opsawg working >>>>>> group >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> support such activities. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you again for your diligent efforts, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> especially the present and former chairs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> who shepherded this work to the point that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is at >>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards Joel >>>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ eman mailing >>>>> list eman@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ eman mailing >>> list eman@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman >> >> _______________________________________________ eman mailing list >> eman@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman >
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Juergen Schoenwaelder
- [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? joel jaeggli
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Alexandre Petrescu
- [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. joel jaeggli
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Nadeau Thomas
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. John Parello (jparello)
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Nadeau Thomas
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Benoit Claise
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Nadeau Thomas
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan)
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Benoit Claise
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Rolf Winter
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Andy Bierman
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Nadeau Thomas
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Rolf Winter
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Romascanu, Dan (Dan)