[eman] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-10: (with DISCUSS)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 22 April 2015 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B971B396F; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 12:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SznQ5aB-1yLC; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 12:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D3F1B3969; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 12:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.1.p1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150422191859.25007.29423.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 12:18:59 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eman/JuX7ZGtVaQNFwWwlz6-2VgiYfbk>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:55:08 -0700
Cc: eman-chairs@ietf.org, eman@ietf.org
Subject: [eman] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-10: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: eman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Discussions about the Energy Management Working Group <eman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eman/>
List-Post: <mailto:eman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 19:19:00 -0000

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-10: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with Stephen's comments that the security considerations are
sorely lacking. I understand his reasoning for not asking the group to
considerably more work at this point in the process. But I'd like to see
at least an explicit mention that power management as described in some
of the use cases in this draft may have significant privacy
considerations--even if that mention takes the form of "We haven't fully
analyzed privacy issues, and leave that work to a follow on effort."

If, on the other hand, people think there aren't privacy issues, I'd like
to see that assertion along with supporting arguments.