Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF?

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 28 June 2016 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8710412B05A for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 07:54:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.333
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QP2hjEJ8oT8C for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 07:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97FD712B051 for <eman@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 07:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id u5SEsZa7027143; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:54:35 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id CD84220822F; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:55:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2AE2081A4; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:55:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id u5SEsZ9X016798; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:54:35 +0200
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, Rolf Winter <rolf.winter@gmail.com>, Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
References: <556E820E.4040208@bogus.com> <55720A99.2030407@cisco.com> <944DE63C-1467-4EC2-976F-24C46588693F@lucidvision.com> <D19C53A1.43722%moulchan@cisco.com> <dc75c6ae-8992-9f2b-9e0f-937eeb6bf54b@gmail.com> <9494BFE6-4782-4B9B-B4BC-B9C474F1C93D@lucidvision.com> <CADfatQ1_632NcmK9jZW9mc=fANEFnnFp2-q130ffZTavt+GsoQ@mail.gmail.com> <34c7f0db-6547-add3-333d-9f390558d0d7@gmail.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751F8C6D@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8fb2d1ec-4a69-42c4-0063-123ada215fc8@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:54:35 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751F8C6D@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eman/KorfX4DPdePQw6RA7wmAwFHSVPo>
Cc: "eman@ietf.org" <eman@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF?
X-BeenThere: eman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the Energy Management Working Group <eman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eman/>
List-Post: <mailto:eman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:54:45 -0000

The SDN paradigm may be applied not just to switches but to smartphones. 
  Further, a tool like CoMI (CoAP Management Interface) may make use of 
YANG models on IoT devices which are typically constrained on battery.

Yesterday I read about an NB-IoT LPWA device from u-blox which runs on a 
battery for 10 years.

Alex

Le 02/06/2016 à 11:20, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) a écrit :
> No, RFC 7577 defines an SMIv2 MIB.
>
> Before engaging in a discussion about 'let us do EMAN data modelling
> in YANG' I would like to see a use case - i.e. an example of an
> energy monitoring system that uses YANG for reporting energy
> information.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
>> -----Original Message----- From: eman
>> [mailto:eman-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandre Petrescu
>> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 11:22 AM To: Rolf Winter; Nadeau
>> Thomas Cc: eman@ietf.org Subject: Re: [eman] energy-specific
>> efforts at IETF?
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 02/06/2016 à 10:18, Rolf Winter a écrit :
>>> Is there anything that the EMAN work is not addressing or that
>>> requires new protocol work?
>>
>> For my clarification - is the battery monitoring MIB RFC7577 using
>> YANG?
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Nadeau Thomas
>> <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Not that I know of in the form of an official working group.
>>>> EMAN was
>> shut down something like a year ago.
>>>>
>>>> --Tom
>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 1, 2016:8:34 AM, at 8:34 AM, Alexandre Petrescu
>> <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any other effort focusing on energy consumption
>>>>> happening at
>> IETF currently?
>>>>>
>>>>> I am interested in aspects related to energy consumption of
>>>>> IP networks
>> used to deliver video streams.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yours,
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex Petrescu
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 09/06/2015 à 05:01, Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan) a écrit
>>>>> :
>>>>>> Thanks to all the WG chairs for shepherding the IETF drafts
>>>>>> and taking them to a conclusion. I may not be able to
>>>>>> travel to Prague.  So, enjoy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers Mouli
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com
>>>>>> <mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com>> Date: Saturday, 6 June
>>>>>> 2015 2:22 AM To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)"
>>>>>> <bclaise@cisco.com <mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> Cc: eman
>>>>>> mailing list <eman@ietf.org <mailto:eman@ietf.org>>,
>>>>>> "eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org
>>>>>> <mailto:eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org>"
>>>>>> <eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org
>>>>>> <mailto:eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [eman]
>>>>>> Status of the EMAN W.G. effort.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Beers are on you! 8)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 5, 2015:4:46 PM, at 4:46 PM, Benoit Claise
>>>>>>> <bclaise@cisco.com <mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, thanks to the contributors, document editors, WG
>>>>>>> chairs, previous ADs :-), basically the entire EMAN
>>>>>>> community. Celebration in Prague? Fine with me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards, Benoit
>>>>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now that we've crossed the milstone of having
>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-11 move to the
>>>>>>>> RFC editor
>> queue,
>>>>>>>> I think we can pause and reflect on the effort that has
>>>>>>>> completed.
>> It
>>>>>>>> took a while to get here and the consensus that we
>>>>>>>> built was hard
>> won
>>>>>>>> but I hope durable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's my intention to close down the working group,
>>>>>>>> maintaining the mailing list for a time. The mailing
>>>>>>>> list archive as with other IETF mailing lists will be
>>>>>>>> preserved. in the immediate sense if there is
>> work
>>>>>>>> around the edges of this space we have the opsawg
>>>>>>>> working group
>> to
>>>>>>>> support such activities.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you again for your diligent efforts, especially
>>>>>>>> the present and former chairs who shepherded this work
>>>>>>>> to the point that it is at
>> now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards Joel
>