Re: [eman] draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-03

"John Parello (jparello)" <jparello@cisco.com> Tue, 15 October 2013 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <jparello@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55BA811E8116 for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 08:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SyXjMOJrch5C for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 08:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78D211E813D for <eman@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 08:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11730; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1381852659; x=1383062259; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=wOGF7x1+QNTq9LORNf1g2pQdg8zv1d1gNREiYXzmsiw=; b=KQOvs3juG/5Ry1AsKTP8x6ZGQkPOgWidYx1gyxLPVh74MwE8mrkHmIMb 08wX4x7HCS5EGwpARAgViRIEtLIhkrHAKvX66w3pH43tYvPua4Puu+05Y HBvElslZD3VpKi1Rzt94h1CKNJ6/nUyO00Lq2VSUHrHQXdNRdTAbyDZsx w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Au0FAF9lXVKtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABXA4JDRDhSuV+IS4EiFnSCJQEBAQQBAQEqPgMEBxACAQgRBAEBCx0HIQYLFAkIAgQBDQUIE4dZAw4BDLNPDYlrjFyCPSEMBAYBEYMOgQYDlhuDGIsdhTaDJIIp
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,500,1378857600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="272360536"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Oct 2013 15:57:38 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com [173.36.12.80]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9FFvcH3030266 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:57:38 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.9.229]) by xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com ([173.36.12.80]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:57:37 -0500
From: "John Parello (jparello)" <jparello@cisco.com>
To: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>, "Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan)" <moulchan@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [eman] draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-03
Thread-Index: AQHOya1XhPmRAxL68E2HFGZjRtJddZn2HvmA///MDyA=
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:57:37 +0000
Message-ID: <9C213D38848B89428F46808B16F6F0860166902A@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com>
References: <9C213D38848B89428F46808B16F6F08601667AFA@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com> <852AF0ED49D9F24BBBFA1B4DEEBE3BA42ADBD274@xmb-rcd-x08.cisco.com> <CAN40gSusU21r7Ph2931bfT+LKXg53fNz=13fj4F-z57dje=pXw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN40gSusU21r7Ph2931bfT+LKXg53fNz=13fj4F-z57dje=pXw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [171.71.223.71]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9C213D38848B89428F46808B16F6F0860166902Axmbalnx04ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "eman@ietf.org" <eman@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eman] draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-03
X-BeenThere: eman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the Energy Management Working Group <eman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eman>
List-Post: <mailto:eman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:57:45 -0000

+1

Contained in one doc for me.

Jp

From: eman-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:eman-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ira McDonald
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 7:03 AM
To: Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan); Ira McDonald
Cc: eman@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [eman] draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-03

Hi Mouli,
I prefer a single Applicability Statement - simpler for implementors and
avoids inconsistencies between two documents.
Cheers,
- Ira

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com<mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan) <moulchan@cisco.com<mailto:moulchan@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hello all,

We are working on updating the  draft Applicability Statement draft before this IETF meeting.

We would like to get the input of the WG on a coupe of important points.

Currently, the EMAN Applicability Statement draft as it stands  contains - use cases and relation standards;  and does not have a discussion of how the technologies developed in EMAN WG - EMAN Framework, MIB modules can be implemented.

Should this draft be split in to two drafts  -  (1) use cases and related standards  (2)  Applicability of EMAN Framework

or  a consolidated Applicability statement draft which contains a section of how the Framework can be applied.

Please provide your thoughts.

Thanks
Mouli



_______________________________________________
eman mailing list
eman@ietf.org<mailto:eman@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman