IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [eman] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-eman-energy-monitoring-mib-08 and draft-ietf-eman-energy-aware-mib-13

Brad Schoening <brads@coraid.com> Wed, 19 February 2014 04:42 UTC

Return-Path: <brads@coraid.com>
X-Original-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219741A0443 for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:42:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BTgF1PUwJjc8 for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:42:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server506.appriver.com (server506e.appriver.com [50.56.144.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C8B1A0428 for <eman@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:42:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Note-AR-ScanTimeLocal: 2/18/2014 10:42:50 PM
X-Policy: GLOBAL - coraid.com
X-Policy: GLOBAL - coraid.com
X-Primary: brads@coraid.com
X-Note: This Email was scanned by AppRiver SecureTide
X-Virus-Scan: V-
X-Note-SnifferID: 0
X-Note: TCH-CT/SI:0-2/SG:2 2/18/2014 10:42:29 PM
X-GBUdb-Analysis: 0, 10.242.229.139, Ugly c=1 p=-0.97397 Source White
X-Signature-Violations: 0-0-0-5120-c
X-Note-419: 15.6006 ms. Fail:1 Chk:1345 of 1345 total
X-Note: SCH-CT/SI:1-1345/SG:1 2/18/2014 10:42:40 PM
X-Note: Spam Tests Failed:
X-Country-Path: UNKNOWN->PRIVATE->UNITED STATES
X-Note-Sending-IP: 10.242.229.139
X-Note-Reverse-DNS: smtp.exg6.exghost.com
X-Note-Return-Path: brads@coraid.com
X-Note: User Rule Hits:
X-Note: Global Rule Hits: G327 G328 G329 G330 G334 G335 G445
X-Note: Encrypt Rule Hits:
X-Note: Mail Class: VALID
X-Note: Headers Injected
Received: from [10.242.229.139] (HELO smtp.exg6.exghost.com) by server506.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.2) with ESMTPS id 152350514; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:42:50 -0600
Received: from DAGN05C-E6.exg6.exghost.com ([169.254.3.11]) by HT05-E6.exg6.exghost.com ([10.242.230.112]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:42:50 -0600
From: Brad Schoening <brads@coraid.com>
To: Juergen Quittek <Quittek@neclab.eu>, eman mailing list <eman@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [eman] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-eman-energy-monitoring-mib-08 and draft-ietf-eman-energy-aware-mib-13
Thread-Index: AQHPLS0LlWQHqcIG20qV50Yoti7E3A==
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 04:42:49 +0000
Message-ID: <CF299D5D.11CCDB%brads@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <9AB93E4127C26F4BA7829DEFDCE5A6E8688B333E@DAPHNIS.office.hd>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121
x-originating-ip: [50.56.144.245]
x-rerouted-by-exchange:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <579A1D2DF4A4F74A8475B60B8580B1C4@fwd6.exghost.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eman/NxrqISp3iIRvfUNmJWFkCbfqFOU
Subject: Re: [eman] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-eman-energy-monitoring-mib-08 and draft-ietf-eman-energy-aware-mib-13
X-BeenThere: eman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the Energy Management Working Group <eman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eman/>
List-Post: <mailto:eman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 04:42:56 -0000

Hi Juergen,

Yes, you're correct that the Entity MIB is mandatory.  I've corrected that
in the updated v9.  I also agree that the redundant Module Compliance
statements are a little redundant.  Not sure if that was worth removing at
this point.

Best Regards,

Brad



On 12/30/13 2:33 PM, "Juergen Quittek" <Quittek@neclab.eu> wrote:

>Dear all,
>
>Here are my last two comments for this WGLC. Both concerns the
>conformance section of the ENERGY-OBJECT-MIB module in
>draft-ietf-eman-energy-monitoring-mib-08:
>
>1. I may have missed a point here: Why is the Entity MIB not mandatory
>anymore to implement? It is just two additional objects, since
>entPhysicalIndex from this MIB is needed anyway. Particularly, we
>considered the UUID provided by this MIB essential for our framework.
>
>2. Why is the module compliance dependency on the Entity MIB repeated in
>the DESCRIPTION clauses of all optional groups within a MODULE-COMPLIANCE
>declaration? I think It is fully sufficient to have it stated in the top
>DESCRIPTION clause of the MODULE-COMPLIANCE declaration. Does it make any
>sense to repeat it for optional groups?
>
>Cheers,
>    Juergen
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: eman [mailto:eman-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Nadeau
>> Sent: Montag, 16. Dezember 2013 16:56
>> To: eman mailing list
>> Subject: [eman] WG Last Call for
>>draft-ietf-eman-energy-monitoring-mib-08
>> and draft-ietf-eman-energy-aware-mib-13
>> 
>> 
>> 	As agreed at the last WG meeting, with the EMAN Framework
>> completing its WG LC the chairs would like to initiate a WG LC on
>>draft-ietf-
>> eman-energy-monitoring-mib-08 and draft-ietf-eman-energy-aware-mib-13.
>> The WG LC will end on Dec 30 at 8AM EDT.
>> 
>> 	Thank you,
>> 
>> 	Nevil and Tom
>> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>eman mailing list
>eman@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email