Re: [eman] draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement

"Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan)" <> Sat, 14 June 2014 03:10 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C0E1B2B22 for <>; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 20:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.151
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QH2cQo-sE-ne for <>; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 20:10:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 725B61B2889 for <>; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 20:10:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=3065; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1402715449; x=1403925049; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=wviGKptjHyzxRc8T7oc3DbD6mBxRn5N2A5PlXAmqAVQ=; b=ecpl6BJQDgGzkW+loiqsWnM7K7jhEKvPBH/w8cIfx+BUZ9CBTD+4Kbe0 AeFluObV26oQjC7fgyy1O1vl/Xd/cOQbEYWEsuv4FQyRDezM5S0MSWqvF wN6ptXwfoVySkczsUrnsoDaMCPVxQyEcDHzYdPWGPbiPZrNu9GkHd65Mo Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,475,1400025600"; d="scan'208,217";a="333052334"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 14 Jun 2014 03:10:48 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5E3AmQZ032621 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 14 Jun 2014 03:10:48 GMT
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 22:10:48 -0500
From: "Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan)" <>
To: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <>, Bruce Nordman <>, Brad Schoening <>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement
Thread-Index: AQHPhxpue+kqYd+NMUmUiPOqdB6eO5twnkeA
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 03:10:48 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CFC1BA742A0F6moulchanciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [eman] draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the Energy Management Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 03:10:51 -0000

Hi  Tom,

I think we need to add one more section, I think.   I had committed to complete some other work for this weekend.  I will get to EMAN next weekend and submit an updated draft – target June 23.



Benoit just asked me to became document shepherd for the applicability statement and move this to completion ASAP - and prior to the next meeting if we can. To this end, I would like to query you guys on what the status on the document is from your perspective.  I've looked over the document and it is in pretty good shape. Now that the other EMAN drafts are finished or almost out the door, we are in the last stretch here as this document is our last chartered item to complete. With this in mind, I would like to target starting a WG LC on this document in about a week. Can you commit to having it ready for a week from today?