Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF?

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[e-mail]>]

No, RFC 7577 defines an SMIv2 MIB. 

Before engaging in a discussion about 'let us do EMAN data modelling in YANG' I would like to see a use case - i.e. an example of an energy monitoring system that uses YANG for reporting energy information. 

Regards,

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: eman [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Alexandre
> Petrescu
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 11:22 AM
> To: Rolf Winter; Nadeau Thomas
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF?
> 
> 
> 
> Le 02/06/2016 à 10:18, Rolf Winter a écrit :
> > Is there anything that the EMAN work is not addressing or that
> > requires new protocol work?
> 
> For my clarification - is the battery monitoring MIB RFC7577 using YANG?
> 
> Alex
> 
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Nadeau Thomas
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>
> >>         Not that I know of in the form of an official working group. EMAN was
> shut down something like a year ago.
> >>
> >>         --Tom
> >>
> >>> On Jun 1, 2016:8:34 AM, at 8:34 AM, Alexandre Petrescu
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Is there any other effort focusing on energy consumption happening at
> IETF currently?
> >>>
> >>> I am interested in aspects related to energy consumption of IP networks
> used to deliver video streams.
> >>>
> >>> Yours,
> >>>
> >>> Alex Petrescu
> >>>
> >>> Le 09/06/2015 à 05:01, Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan) a écrit :
> >>>> Thanks to all the WG chairs for shepherding the IETF drafts and
> >>>> taking them to a conclusion.
> >>>> I may not be able to travel to Prague.  So, enjoy.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers
> >>>> Mouli
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Nadeau Thomas <[e-mail]
> >>>> <mailto:[e-mail]>>
> >>>> Date: Saturday, 6 June 2015 2:22 AM
> >>>> To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <[e-mail]
> >>>> <mailto:[e-mail]>>
> >>>> Cc: eman mailing list <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>,
> >>>> "[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>"
> >>>> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
> >>>> Subject: Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>    Beers are on you! 8)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>    On Jun 5, 2015:4:46 PM, at 4:46 PM, Benoit Claise
> >>>>>    <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    Yes, thanks to the contributors, document editors, WG chairs,
> >>>>>    previous ADs :-), basically the entire EMAN community.
> >>>>>    Celebration in Prague? Fine with me.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    Regards, Benoit
> >>>>>>    Greetings,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    Now that we've crossed the milstone of having
> >>>>>>    draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-11 move to the RFC editor
> queue,
> >>>>>>    I think we can pause and reflect on the effort that has completed.
> It
> >>>>>>    took a while to get here and the consensus that we built was hard
> won
> >>>>>>    but I hope durable.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    It's my intention to close down the working group, maintaining the
> >>>>>>    mailing list for a time. The mailing list archive as with other IETF
> >>>>>>    mailing lists will be preserved. in the immediate sense if there is
> work
> >>>>>>    around the edges of this space we have the opsawg working group
> to
> >>>>>>    support such activities.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    Thank you again for your diligent efforts, especially the present and
> >>>>>>    former chairs who shepherded this work to the point that it is at
> now.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    Regards
> >>>>>>    Joel