Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF?

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Thu, 02 June 2016 09:21 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1ED12D675 for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 02:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.346
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.346 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GfwVOMz0ichp for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 02:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FBDA12D687 for <eman@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 02:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2B8AQBD+U9X/yYyC4deGgEBAQGCcCyBU?= =?us-ascii?q?waNIKEaiWCCD4F5hhECHIEWOBQBAQEBAQEBZSeERQEBAQEDEhEROgsMBAIBCA0?= =?us-ascii?q?EAwEBAQECAgYdAwICAh8RFAEICAIEAQ0FCAwLA4dzAxcBpVeKUIx0DYQfAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHIEBhSeETIJDgUk2FYJqK4IuBZgEMwGMJQGLUYV?= =?us-ascii?q?Eh2SHaB42g21uiX0BfgEBAQ?=
X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2B8AQBD+U9X/yYyC4deGgEBAQGCcCyBUwaNIKEaiWCCD4F?= =?us-ascii?q?5hhECHIEWOBQBAQEBAQEBZSeERQEBAQEDEhEROgsMBAIBCA0EAwEBAQECAgYdA?= =?us-ascii?q?wICAh8RFAEICAIEAQ0FCAwLA4dzAxcBpVeKUIx0DYQfAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBHIEBhSeETIJDgUk2FYJqK4IuBZgEMwGMJQGLUYVEh2SHaB42g21ui?= =?us-ascii?q?X0BfgEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,405,1459828800"; d="scan'208";a="177660822"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast-smtpauth.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.38]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 02 Jun 2016 05:21:10 -0400
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC03.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.13]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 02 Jun 2016 05:20:55 -0400
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC03.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.13]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 05:20:52 -0400
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, Rolf Winter <rolf.winter@gmail.com>, Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
Thread-Topic: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF?
Thread-Index: AQHRvKdnCvDVoFL2UEKkfb1/eOv6/5/VtOeAgAAw0AA=
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 09:20:51 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751F8C6D@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <556E820E.4040208@bogus.com> <55720A99.2030407@cisco.com> <944DE63C-1467-4EC2-976F-24C46588693F@lucidvision.com> <D19C53A1.43722%moulchan@cisco.com> <dc75c6ae-8992-9f2b-9e0f-937eeb6bf54b@gmail.com> <9494BFE6-4782-4B9B-B4BC-B9C474F1C93D@lucidvision.com> <CADfatQ1_632NcmK9jZW9mc=fANEFnnFp2-q130ffZTavt+GsoQ@mail.gmail.com> <34c7f0db-6547-add3-333d-9f390558d0d7@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <34c7f0db-6547-add3-333d-9f390558d0d7@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.47]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eman/UwSxW2SQTFcz-QA-jXKZhDu1qvc>
Cc: "eman@ietf.org" <eman@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF?
X-BeenThere: eman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the Energy Management Working Group <eman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eman/>
List-Post: <mailto:eman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 09:21:14 -0000

No, RFC 7577 defines an SMIv2 MIB. 

Before engaging in a discussion about 'let us do EMAN data modelling in YANG' I would like to see a use case - i.e. an example of an energy monitoring system that uses YANG for reporting energy information. 

Regards,

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: eman [mailto:eman-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandre
> Petrescu
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 11:22 AM
> To: Rolf Winter; Nadeau Thomas
> Cc: eman@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF?
> 
> 
> 
> Le 02/06/2016 à 10:18, Rolf Winter a écrit :
> > Is there anything that the EMAN work is not addressing or that
> > requires new protocol work?
> 
> For my clarification - is the battery monitoring MIB RFC7577 using YANG?
> 
> Alex
> 
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Nadeau Thomas
> <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>         Not that I know of in the form of an official working group. EMAN was
> shut down something like a year ago.
> >>
> >>         --Tom
> >>
> >>> On Jun 1, 2016:8:34 AM, at 8:34 AM, Alexandre Petrescu
> <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Is there any other effort focusing on energy consumption happening at
> IETF currently?
> >>>
> >>> I am interested in aspects related to energy consumption of IP networks
> used to deliver video streams.
> >>>
> >>> Yours,
> >>>
> >>> Alex Petrescu
> >>>
> >>> Le 09/06/2015 à 05:01, Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan) a écrit :
> >>>> Thanks to all the WG chairs for shepherding the IETF drafts and
> >>>> taking them to a conclusion.
> >>>> I may not be able to travel to Prague.  So, enjoy.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers
> >>>> Mouli
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com
> >>>> <mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com>>
> >>>> Date: Saturday, 6 June 2015 2:22 AM
> >>>> To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com
> >>>> <mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>>
> >>>> Cc: eman mailing list <eman@ietf.org <mailto:eman@ietf.org>>,
> >>>> "eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org <mailto:eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org>"
> >>>> <eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org <mailto:eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org>>
> >>>> Subject: Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>    Beers are on you! 8)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>    On Jun 5, 2015:4:46 PM, at 4:46 PM, Benoit Claise
> >>>>>    <bclaise@cisco.com <mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    Yes, thanks to the contributors, document editors, WG chairs,
> >>>>>    previous ADs :-), basically the entire EMAN community.
> >>>>>    Celebration in Prague? Fine with me.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    Regards, Benoit
> >>>>>>    Greetings,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    Now that we've crossed the milstone of having
> >>>>>>    draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-11 move to the RFC editor
> queue,
> >>>>>>    I think we can pause and reflect on the effort that has completed.
> It
> >>>>>>    took a while to get here and the consensus that we built was hard
> won
> >>>>>>    but I hope durable.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    It's my intention to close down the working group, maintaining the
> >>>>>>    mailing list for a time. The mailing list archive as with other IETF
> >>>>>>    mailing lists will be preserved. in the immediate sense if there is
> work
> >>>>>>    around the edges of this space we have the opsawg working group
> to
> >>>>>>    support such activities.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    Thank you again for your diligent efforts, especially the present and
> >>>>>>    former chairs who shepherded this work to the point that it is at
> now.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    Regards
> >>>>>>    Joel