[eman] @Chairs : Liaison work with ETSI

"John Parello (jparello)" <jparello@cisco.com> Thu, 31 October 2013 23:52 UTC

From: "John Parello (jparello)" <jparello@cisco.com>
To: "eman@ietf.org" <eman@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: @Chairs : Liaison work with ETSI
Thread-Index: Ac7WlEXoUOOAh1/dSyiO6N2UoxErlQ==
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 23:52:29 +0000
Message-ID: <9C213D38848B89428F46808B16F6F0860167CDB2@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [eman] @Chairs : Liaison work with ETSI
Precedence: list

Hi Chairs,

Benoit and I had a call with some of the members of (European Telecommunication Standards Institute) ETSI who are working on the Green Abstraction Layer. (GAL) This was w.r.t. our liaison with them.

I don't know all of the procedures with a liaison etc but we met to make sure the work was aligned.

We reviewed their GAL spec and they intern reviewed the framework. The good news was there was a lot of synergy. We gave four items that they could (and did) incorporate in their draft. So that was a good vote on our approach

They incorporated 4 items:

1) (GAL) Resource ID would map to (EMAN) RFC 4133
2) (GAL) Power measurement would have a (EMAN) value and exponent
3) (GAL) Power measurement would include (EMAN) caliber
4) (GAL) Two-dimensional Power States would map to an (EMAN) array of states 

For us that means we can identify, report power, and use states in a similar way that won't clash semantically.

I'm not sure what to answer further to the groups so what do the chairs and AD think is the next steps?

Thanks
Jp

[eman] @Chairs : Liaison work with ETSI John Parello (jparello)