Re: [eman] draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-03

Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> Tue, 15 October 2013 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC7D11E8205 for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:42:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RyrabfOejH4d for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (mail-ie0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F8911E820E for <eman@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id aq17so14698499iec.10 for <eman@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=0g54/CpLWoOcqv3nZ/nI8dzci3FJ3OAWOSoUVtQnBYc=; b=eocBP2IJ38iwQAL8cwaiXxxjvJpBy9l+FjcZfTO5MUUC8RhYbNXLrCT/1VZ69KdSH9 1wLTAYMcFwMMTZD0aOz9vQ7dwNxeXZDX2s6gvsgnG2N/8kmZqR/yIl0GSskZfubHILVv PFdnk+sx0IVqo7Y2Z6juHBY2sbbM+K/zXj61bJ+7q1yA1qD32k6Y5FBPVmkN5edwgcTo ko/tQFxJefI3Id1VVRuDX7pibUVbbJm5SKwvZDuAbGigbMI91ON7w3MtVgjLB472yrxq xBEINnZSet/R4LRs3G51aIIdlD1P0kejh0SQ1KhDK/JxDMmu10aw50H0GbID4FVzgxyN vUHQ==
X-Received: by 10.50.61.35 with SMTP id m3mr16609079igr.56.1381869740549; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.96.135 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CE82EC88.EB6A1%brads@coraid.com>
References: <CAN40gSusU21r7Ph2931bfT+LKXg53fNz=13fj4F-z57dje=pXw@mail.gmail.com> <CE82EC88.EB6A1%brads@coraid.com>
From: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:42:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CAN40gSuMoHNieB4yjYP-rQkFG+wy2tQknwWhPZhPmfXs9oio9g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Schoening <brads@coraid.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1134b62c02f1d504e8cd9f4f"
Cc: "eman@ietf.org" <eman@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eman] draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-03
X-BeenThere: eman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the Energy Management Working Group <eman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eman>
List-Post: <mailto:eman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:42:24 -0000

Hi Brad,

Ah - I see (I think) - I was thinking about the implementation guidelines
(for MIBs or
other bindings of the EMAN Model).

I agree that Applicability for the external standards and EMAN use cases
seems
to be an obscure use of the word Applicability.

I'd prefer a different title, such as "EMAN Framework Standards Context".

And a second "EMAN MIBs Implementation Guide" document.

Does that make sense?

Cheers,
- Ira



Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com
Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434



On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Brad Schoening <brads@coraid.com> wrote:

>   Ira,
>
>  The root of the issue is that the "Applicability Statement" begin as a
> companion documents to the EMAN Framework addressing the applicability of
> other standards and information models w.r.t. the EMAN framework.   Since
> then, use cases have also been added to the Applicability Statement
> document.
>
>  Use of the name 'Applicability' has lead to confusion that this document
> will also provide implementation guidelines and best practices. While such
> a document would be valuable, its not clear how it relates to abstract use
> cases and international and national standards bodies.
>
>  The Abstract of the Applicability statement claims:
>
>  	Abstract
>
>         The objective of Energy Management (EMAN)is to provide an energy
>         management framework for networked devices. This document
>         presents the applicability of the EMAN framework for a variety
>         of scenarios. This document lists use cases and target devices
>         that can potentially implement the EMAN framework and associated
>         SNMP MIB modules. These use cases are useful for identifying
>         monitoring requirements that need to be considered. Further, we
>         describe the relationship of the EMAN framework to relevant
>
> other energy monitoring standards and architectures.
>
>  So, it might be more useful to think of this as the EMAN Framework
> Applicability Statement vs. an EMAN MIB Applicability/Implementation Guide.
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Brad
>
>  *Brad Schoening*
> Engineering | Coraid
> Tel: +1 917 304 7190
> brads@coraid.com | www.coraid.com
>  *Coraid: Redefining Storage*
>
>
>   From: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:02:59 -0400
> To: "Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan)" <moulchan@cisco.com>, Ira McDonald <
> blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
> Cc: "eman@ietf.org" <eman@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [eman] draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-03
>
>    Hi Mouli,
>
>  I prefer a single Applicability Statement - simpler for implementors and
>  avoids inconsistencies between two documents.
>
>  Cheers,
>  - Ira
>
>
> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
> Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
> Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
> Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
> Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
> Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
> IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
> Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
> http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
> http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
> mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com
> Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
> Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan) <
> moulchan@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>>  Hello all,
>>
>>  We are working on updating the  draft Applicability Statement draft
>> before this IETF meeting.
>>
>>  We would like to get the input of the WG on a coupe of important
>> points.
>>
>>  Currently, the EMAN Applicability Statement draft as it stands
>>  contains – use cases and relation standards;  and does not have a
>> discussion of how the technologies developed in EMAN WG – EMAN Framework,
>> MIB modules can be implemented.
>>
>>  Should this draft be split in to two drafts  -  (1) use cases and
>> related standards  (2)  Applicability of EMAN Framework
>>
>>  or  a consolidated Applicability statement draft which contains a
>> section of how the Framework can be applied.
>>
>>  Please provide your thoughts.
>>
>>  Thanks
>>  Mouli
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> eman mailing list
>> eman@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
>>
>>
>  _______________________________________________ eman mailing list
> eman@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
>