Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB

[Juergen Schoenwaelder <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

how is this different from 'smidump -f yang BATTERY-MIB', which
implements the translation defined in RFC 6643? RFC 6643 was written
to avoid manual translations and having to republish MIB modules

/js

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 02:24:34PM +0200, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> We have submitted a new draft describing a YANG model for the battery MIB:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-petrescu-battery-mib-yang-00
> 
> How should we pursue this draft?
> 
> Alex
> 
> Le 06/07/2016 à 13:52, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit :
> > 
> > 
> > Le 30/06/2016 à 06:49, joel jaeggli a écrit :
> > > On 6/28/16 8:10 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> > > > Sure. But your two statements (in the first paragraph) use each of
> > > > the conditional 'may'. What is the reason to use YANG on the devices?
> > > > The SDN paradigm does not AFAIK make assumptions about using a
> > > > specific protocol or DML at the device management level. YANG comes
> > > > at a certain cost (bits on wire, memory). Maybe this is affordable,
> > > > or maybe YANG is needed for other reasons, but this needs to be shown
> > > > explicitely.
> > > 
> > > Signaling presumes in some utility is derived from coordination.
> > > 
> > > If I have a ten year primary battery or I'm a space probe headed to
> > > alpha centuri I'm not going to devote a lot of electrons to expressing
> > > my power consumption or battery condition.
> > > 
> > > More active or particularly coordinated groups of devices such as the
> > > elements of a BST or a datacenter might well have information to share.
> > 
> > Whereas I can expect a BST (Base Station?) to be operated on chemical
> > battery in emergency areas, it would be hard to imagine an entire
> > datacenter on battery - wouldn't it rather be on combustion-engine
> > electricity generators?
> > 
> > For the BST case: I will write separately.
> > 
> > For the datacenter: I think there would be a need for an entirely
> > different MIB, different than a battery-MIB.
> > 
> > Alex
> > 
> > > 
> > > > Regards,
> > > > 
> > > > Dan
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > -----Original Message----- From: Alexandre Petrescu
> > > > > [mailto:[e-mail]] Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016
> > > > > 5:55 PM To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Rolf Winter; Nadeau Thomas Cc:
> > > > > [e-mail] Subject: Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF?
> > > > > 
> > > > > The SDN paradigm may be applied not just to switches but to
> > > > > smartphones. Further, a tool like CoMI (CoAP Management Interface)
> > > > > may make use of YANG models on IoT devices which are typically
> > > > > constrained on battery.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yesterday I read about an NB-IoT LPWA device from u-blox which runs
> > > > > on a battery for 10 years.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Alex
> > > > > 
> > > > > Le 02/06/2016 à 11:20, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) a écrit :
> > > > > > No, RFC 7577 defines an SMIv2 MIB.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Before engaging in a discussion about 'let us do EMAN data
> > > > > > modelling in YANG' I would like to see a use case - i.e. an
> > > > > > example of an energy monitoring system that uses YANG for
> > > > > > reporting energy information.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Dan
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > -----Original Message----- From: eman
> > > > > > > [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Alexandre Petrescu
> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 11:22 AM To: Rolf Winter; Nadeau
> > > > > > > Thomas Cc: [e-mail] Subject: Re: [eman] energy-specific
> > > > > > > efforts at IETF?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Le 02/06/2016 à 10:18, Rolf Winter a écrit :
> > > > > > > > Is there anything that the EMAN work is not addressing or
> > > > > > > > that requires new protocol work?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > For my clarification - is the battery monitoring MIB RFC7577
> > > > > > > using YANG?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Alex
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Nadeau Thomas
> > > > > > > <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Not that I know of in the form of an official working
> > > > > > > > > group. EMAN was
> > > > > > > shut down something like a year ago.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > --Tom
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > On Jun 1, 2016:8:34 AM, at 8:34 AM, Alexandre Petrescu
> > > > > > > <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Is there any other effort focusing on energy consumption
> > > > > > > > > > happening at
> > > > > > > IETF currently?
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > I am interested in aspects related to energy consumption
> > > > > > > > > > of IP networks
> > > > > > > used to deliver video streams.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Yours,
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Alex Petrescu
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Le 09/06/2015 à 05:01, Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan) a
> > > > > > > > > > écrit :
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks to all the WG chairs for shepherding the IETF
> > > > > > > > > > > drafts and taking them to a conclusion. I may not be
> > > > > > > > > > > able to travel to Prague.  So, enjoy.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Cheers Mouli
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > From: Nadeau Thomas <[e-mail]
> > > > > > > > > > > <mailto:[e-mail]>> Date: Saturday, 6
> > > > > > > > > > > June 2015 2:22 AM To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)"
> > > > > > > > > > > <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> Cc: eman
> > > > > > > > > > > mailing list <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>,
> > > > > > > > > > > "[e-mail]
> > > > > > > > > > > <mailto:[e-mail]>"
> > > > > > > > > > > <[e-mail]
> > > > > > > > > > > <mailto:[e-mail]>> Subject: Re:
> > > > > > > > > > > [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Beers are on you! 8)
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 5, 2015:4:46 PM, at 4:46 PM, Benoit Claise
> > > > > > > > > > > > <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, thanks to the contributors, document editors, WG
> > > > > > > > > > > > chairs, previous ADs :-), basically the entire EMAN
> > > > > > > > > > > > community. Celebration in Prague? Fine with me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, Benoit
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Greetings,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Now that we've crossed the milstone of having
> > > > > > > > > > > > > draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-11 move to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the RFC editor
> > > > > > > queue,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we can pause and reflect on the effort that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > has completed.
> > > > > > > It
> > > > > > > > > > > > > took a while to get here and the consensus that we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > built was hard
> > > > > > > won
> > > > > > > > > > > > > but I hope durable.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > It's my intention to close down the working group,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > maintaining the mailing list for a time. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > mailing list archive as with other IETF mailing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > lists will be preserved. in the immediate sense if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > there is
> > > > > > > work
> > > > > > > > > > > > > around the edges of this space we have the opsawg
> > > > > > > > > > > > > working
> > > > > group
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > support such activities.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you again for your diligent efforts,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > especially the present and former chairs who
> > > > > > > > > > > > > shepherded this work to the point that it is at
> > > > > > > now.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards Joel
> > > > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________ eman mailing list
> > > > [e-mail] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > eman mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eman mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   [phone]         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>