Re: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs

"David Prantl" <david@prantl.name> Mon, 17 February 2014 08:42 UTC

From: David Prantl <david@prantl.name>
To: 'Thomas Nadeau' <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>, 'eman mailing list' <eman@ietf.org>
References: <88A474D1-677D-4BA0-8399-0429A095AE45@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <88A474D1-677D-4BA0-8399-0429A095AE45@lucidvision.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:42:45 +0100
Message-ID: <001801cf2bbc$3b43f870$b1cbe950$@prantl.name>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Index: AQHC6u7uBAKsxvXaYoAFJCbQSShBjJrRolsw
Content-Language: de
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eman/vSOtCMFXF8UK-JQNUVkbKChEGd0
Subject: Re: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs
Precedence: list

Hi,

Currently the Cisco Energywise Manager/Joulex Energy Manager only has been
used with read-only implementations of the EMAN-MIB.

Thanks
Mouli


-----Original Message-----
From: eman [mailto:eman-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Nadeau
Sent: Dienstag, 11. Februar 2014 17:03
To: eman mailing list
Subject: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs

	
	EMAN WG:

	The EMAN WG currently has three MIBs that are WG drafts:

	draft-ietf-eman-battery-mib-11	
	draft-ietf-eman-energy-aware-mib-14
	draft-ietf-eman-energy-monitoring-mib-08

	At present Benoit as AD, the Ops Directorate and MIB Doctors are
preparing a statement to WGs that strongly recommends against MIBs with
writable objects unless the working group has a strong consensus to do so.
The current *draft* of the statement is listed here for your information:

The OPS area recommends the use of NETCONF/YANG standards for configuration.
IETF working groups are therefore encouraged to use the NETCONF/YANG
standards for configuration, specifically in new charters. SNMP MIB modules
modifying persistent configuration state should only be produced by working
groups in cases of clear utility and overwhelming consensus to use SNMP
write operations for configuration.

	In an effort to head off any potential snafus during the IESG review
of the three EMAN MIBs, I want to poll the WG for consensus on whether or
not to make the current list of WG documents read-write or read-only. If
there is not strong consensus to leave them read-write, Nevil and I will
instruct the editors to edit the documents to remove writable objects.

	Please post comments on this matter by Friday, February 14, 2014 at
9AM EDT.


	Tom
	EMAN WG Co-Chair

[eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs Thomas Nadeau
Re: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Re: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs Juergen Schoenwaelder
Re: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Re: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs Juergen Schoenwaelder
Re: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs Thomas Nadeau
Re: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs Thomas Nadeau
Re: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs Juergen Schoenwaelder
Re: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs Thomas Nadeau
Re: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs Bruce Nordman
Re: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan)
Re: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs David Prantl
Re: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Re: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs Juergen Schoenwaelder
Re: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Re: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs Thomas D. Nadeau
Re: [eman] Read-Only or Read-Write EMAN MIBs John Parello (jparello)