Re: [eman] draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement

"Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan)" <> Tue, 24 June 2014 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68A61B2A29 for <>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.151
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mjHcTQobpy-Y for <>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0910C1B294B for <>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=2853; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1403618330; x=1404827930; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=0iKLfsIeko3ebNGbjXOhsNFMkbv2K/WVyzGHTM2fY6c=; b=hmgSyjByvGBRXP8wHGp3wk3G0ha1svWc+8FdqhL3zGAPuhtR0tIvXP8r FdP5++s9bFFXlj76ZFFcPxPFh27HepY4uk0tjk3xdDcpEWk4cd6oX127x dlN+qkirmVY44VblT3np0OnhObSTekXNi9vI4S3D63uBgG2GR3siTUkbQ w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,538,1400025600"; d="scan'208,217";a="335251494"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 24 Jun 2014 13:58:49 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5ODwn1Y029612 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:58:49 GMT
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:58:49 -0500
From: "Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan)" <>
To: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <>, Bruce Nordman <>, Brad Schoening <>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement
Thread-Index: AQHPhxpue+kqYd+NMUmUiPOqdB6eO5uBCqUA
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:58:48 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CFCF818B2AB86moulchanciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [eman] draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the Energy Management Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:58:51 -0000

Hi  Tom,

An updated draft has been submitted per your suggestion.  The WG chairs can decide on the  WG LC.



Benoit just asked me to became document shepherd for the applicability statement and move this to completion ASAP - and prior to the next meeting if we can. To this end, I would like to query you guys on what the status on the document is from your perspective.  I've looked over the document and it is in pretty good shape. Now that the other EMAN drafts are finished or almost out the door, we are in the last stretch here as this document is our last chartered item to complete. With this in mind, I would like to target starting a WG LC on this document in about a week. Can you commit to having it ready for a week from today?