Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort.
Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Wed, 03 June 2015 11:37 UTC
Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290C41A1C06 for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 04:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.612
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.612 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DWkPL8DEtY3t for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 04:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [64.71.170.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EA191A1BFA for <eman@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 04:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lucidvision.com; s=default; t=1433331432; bh=iIkU4g2cbDBmdnVaS6emXo3RxTRZoeDsgchW/4Oewf0=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=wvrz/qnrDaL2ZAObLPafJXlkVH1yNelAAuY48oTbO/A9ZhvNXM4feZzMvP1gNLvaX ZeqqGXEGtHupMEU2lJFs21cExXGqCNT416d712vLJxM1mLP3NtBipsb9ftqBqWSBUZ xW1herxHkYhFid7sZAYuwEhy8TriyqvZw19Kr3Ho=
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.255.148.181;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <556E820E.4040208@bogus.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 07:35:27 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8AC59218-EE71-4508-8095-3F185AA551D5@lucidvision.com>
References: <556E820E.4040208@bogus.com>
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
X-Authenticated-User: tnadeau@lucidvision.com
X-Info: aspam skipped due to (g_smite_skip_relay)
X-Encryption: SSL encrypted
X-MyRbl: Color=Yellow Age=0 Spam=0 Notspam=3 Stars=0 Good=0 Friend=0 Surbl=0 Catch=0 r=0 ip=50.255.148.181
X-IP-stats: Notspam Incoming Last 0, First 19, in=152, out=0, spam=0 Known=true ip=50.255.148.181
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eman/xXHK0UI4-PmKUqO234h8nM1k9b4>
Cc: eman mailing list <eman@ietf.org>, "eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort.
X-BeenThere: eman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the Energy Management Working Group <eman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eman/>
List-Post: <mailto:eman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 11:37:16 -0000
This was my first co-chairing experience and so I wanted to thank everyone here and especially Joel, Benoit and Nevil for their patience and help with this experience. It was a pleasure working with you all and I am glad we were all able to get the ball over the goal line! —Tom > On Jun 3, 2015:12:26 AM, at 12:26 AM, joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote: > > Greetings, > > Now that we've crossed the milstone of having > draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-11 move to the RFC editor queue, > I think we can pause and reflect on the effort that has completed. It > took a while to get here and the consensus that we built was hard won > but I hope durable. > > It's my intention to close down the working group, maintaining the > mailing list for a time. The mailing list archive as with other IETF > mailing lists will be preserved. in the immediate sense if there is work > around the edges of this space we have the opsawg working group to > support such activities. > > Thank you again for your diligent efforts, especially the present and > former chairs who shepherded this work to the point that it is at now. > > Regards > Joel >
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Juergen Schoenwaelder
- [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? joel jaeggli
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Alexandre Petrescu
- [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. joel jaeggli
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Nadeau Thomas
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. John Parello (jparello)
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Nadeau Thomas
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Benoit Claise
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Nadeau Thomas
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan)
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Benoit Claise
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Rolf Winter
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Andy Bierman
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Nadeau Thomas
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Rolf Winter
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Romascanu, Dan (Dan)