Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF?
Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Wed, 01 June 2016 18:00 UTC
Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939AB12D0A4 for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.428
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.428 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lucidvision.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PQ31V5IZRvhL for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [64.71.170.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BD2212D09D for <eman@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lucidvision.com; s=default; t=1464803982; bh=Wtde8TvANmpvK9zsiBuIh6jzerOqqmTnKOu+VAlwhEw=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=Vr4fkeKBrm2BiTldCIoZ31wTHqOu7+6H6ZIUThaX5BM1Ymtax4PXooFccq9p3RL8a 459dQlJ7vqzk//SG4WJXdKRKCaF+v8pensdvbyYX+5wNpbmw5dI0L9vqWadS9oJYQK yhtVFexlznWJb52SAVx1V3PFMcX+svoaHkJfHg9g=
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.255.148.181;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <dc75c6ae-8992-9f2b-9e0f-937eeb6bf54b@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 14:00:15 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9494BFE6-4782-4B9B-B4BC-B9C474F1C93D@lucidvision.com>
References: <556E820E.4040208@bogus.com> <55720A99.2030407@cisco.com> <944DE63C-1467-4EC2-976F-24C46588693F@lucidvision.com> <D19C53A1.43722%moulchan@cisco.com> <dc75c6ae-8992-9f2b-9e0f-937eeb6bf54b@gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-Authenticated-User: tnadeau@lucidvision.com
X-Info: aspam skipped due to (g_smite_skip_relay)
X-Encryption: SSL encrypted
X-MyRbl: Color=Unknown ip=50.255.148.181
X-IP-stats: Notspam Incoming Last 1, First 383, in=3820, out=0, spam=0 Known=true ip=50.255.148.181
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eman/y3n-b4LWbW65NcFZLAA-138iC0s>
Cc: eman@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF?
X-BeenThere: eman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the Energy Management Working Group <eman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eman/>
List-Post: <mailto:eman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 18:00:42 -0000
Not that I know of in the form of an official working group. EMAN was shut down something like a year ago. --Tom > On Jun 1, 2016:8:34 AM, at 8:34 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there any other effort focusing on energy consumption happening at IETF currently? > > I am interested in aspects related to energy consumption of IP networks used to deliver video streams. > > Yours, > > Alex Petrescu > > Le 09/06/2015 à 05:01, Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan) a écrit : >> Thanks to all the WG chairs for shepherding the IETF drafts and taking >> them to a conclusion. >> I may not be able to travel to Prague. So, enjoy. >> >> Cheers >> Mouli >> >> From: Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com >> <mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com>> >> Date: Saturday, 6 June 2015 2:22 AM >> To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com <mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> >> Cc: eman mailing list <eman@ietf.org <mailto:eman@ietf.org>>, >> "eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org <mailto:eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" >> <eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org <mailto:eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org>> >> Subject: Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. >> >> >> Beers are on you! 8) >> >> >>> On Jun 5, 2015:4:46 PM, at 4:46 PM, Benoit Claise >>> <bclaise@cisco.com <mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Yes, thanks to the contributors, document editors, WG chairs, >>> previous ADs :-), basically the entire EMAN community. >>> Celebration in Prague? Fine with me. >>> >>> Regards, Benoit >>>> Greetings, >>>> >>>> Now that we've crossed the milstone of having >>>> draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-11 move to the RFC editor queue, >>>> I think we can pause and reflect on the effort that has completed. It >>>> took a while to get here and the consensus that we built was hard won >>>> but I hope durable. >>>> >>>> It's my intention to close down the working group, maintaining the >>>> mailing list for a time. The mailing list archive as with other IETF >>>> mailing lists will be preserved. in the immediate sense if there is work >>>> around the edges of this space we have the opsawg working group to >>>> support such activities. >>>> >>>> Thank you again for your diligent efforts, especially the present and >>>> former chairs who shepherded this work to the point that it is at now. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Joel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> eman mailing list >>>> eman@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> eman mailing list >>> eman@ietf.org <mailto:eman@ietf.org> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> eman mailing list >> eman@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman >> > > _______________________________________________ > eman mailing list > eman@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Juergen Schoenwaelder
- [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? joel jaeggli
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Alexandre Petrescu
- [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. joel jaeggli
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Nadeau Thomas
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. John Parello (jparello)
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Nadeau Thomas
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Benoit Claise
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Nadeau Thomas
- Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort. Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan)
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Benoit Claise
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Rolf Winter
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Andy Bierman
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [eman] YANG model for battery MIB Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Nadeau Thomas
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Rolf Winter
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF? Romascanu, Dan (Dan)