Re: [EME] the end of EME?

Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com> Wed, 30 January 2008 14:46 UTC

User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:46:46 -0500
Subject: Re: [EME] the end of EME?
From: Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com>
To: Tilman Wolf <wolf@ecs.umass.edu>, EME@irtf.org
Message-ID: <C3C5F806.321CD%mshore@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [EME] the end of EME?
Thread-Index: AchjTu+wLivuaM9CEdyrYwAKleNSdA==
In-Reply-To: <47A088FE.1010407@ecs.umass.edu>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc:
Precedence: list
Errors-To: eme-bounces@irtf.org

On 1/30/08 9:26 AM, "Tilman Wolf" <wolf@ecs.umass.edu> wrote:
> After publishing 
> draft-irtf-eme-francis-nutss-design-00 last year and holding a good
> meeting at IETF-69 (jointly with HIPRG), activities have died down.

I'm not sure that things might not have gone differently if we
hadn't met with HIP, but there's no way to know for sure.

I think there's a broader question here, and that's the role of
signaling work in the IETF.  It's my general sense that neither
customers nor manufacturers like out-of-band signaling very
much, which suggests that in practice (for an engineering
organization) it's not going to be a very successful way
to solve problems.

Melinda

_______________________________________________
EME mailing list
EME@irtf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eme