RE: [EME] First cut at eme requirements
"Paul Francis" <francis@cs.cornell.edu> Tue, 28 November 2006 17:08 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gp6RF-0004rt-5t; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:08:09 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gp6RD-0004qZ-Tw for eme@irtf.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:08:07 -0500
Received: from exchfenlb-2.cs.cornell.edu ([128.84.97.34] helo=exchfe2.cs.cornell.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gp6RB-0003YG-MD for eme@irtf.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:08:07 -0500
Received: from EXCHANGE2.cs.cornell.edu ([128.84.96.44]) by exchfe2.cs.cornell.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:08:05 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [EME] First cut at eme requirements
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:08:04 -0500
Message-ID: <E6F7A586E0A3F94D921755964F6BE006625E94@EXCHANGE2.cs.cornell.edu>
In-Reply-To: <456C577A.6080400@cs.tcd.ie>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [EME] First cut at eme requirements
Thread-Index: AccTBelg64aKtxdJRL2SpSSiDGbcgQACdXMA
From: Paul Francis <francis@cs.cornell.edu>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Nov 2006 17:08:05.0247 (UTC) FILETIME=[C4EA38F0:01C7130F]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0ddefe323dd869ab027dbfff7eff0465
Cc: eme <eme@irtf.org>
X-BeenThere: eme@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: end-middle-end research group <eme.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eme>, <mailto:eme-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/eme>
List-Post: <mailto:eme@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eme-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eme>, <mailto:eme-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: eme-bounces@irtf.org
Well taken...thanks. PF -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 10:36 AM To: Paul Francis Cc: eme Subject: Re: [EME] First cut at eme requirements That conflates privacy and confidentiality which are different things. REQ-4 talks about confidentiality but the nearby text talks about things like (anon)nymity. I suggest separating those, at least. Stephen. Paul Francis wrote: > Gang, > > Attached is a rough draft of a requirements document for EME. This is > meant to be the union of the requirements that Handley and I presented > at the BOF in Montreal. The goal here is to be ambitious but > realistic, and to try to limit ourselves to basic and important > requirements. This really is a rough draft, and is meant to motivate and focus discussion. > > Mark W, could you post on the wiki when you get a chance? > > Thanks, > > PF (and Saikat) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > _______________________________________________ > EME mailing list > EME@irtf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eme _______________________________________________ EME mailing list EME@irtf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eme
- [EME] First cut at eme requirements Paul Francis
- Re: [EME] First cut at eme requirements Stephen Farrell
- RE: [EME] First cut at eme requirements Paul Francis
- Re: [EME] First cut at eme requirements Scott W Brim
- Re: [EME] First cut at eme requirements Mark Baugher
- RE: [EME] First cut at eme requirements Paul Francis
- RE: [EME] First cut at eme requirements Paul Francis
- Re: [EME] First cut at eme requirements Mark Baugher
- Re: [EME] First cut at eme requirements Rémi Després
- RE: [EME] First cut at eme requirements Paul Francis
- RE: [EME] First cut at eme requirements Paul Francis
- Re: [EME] First cut at eme requirements Rémi Després
- Re: [EME] First cut at eme requirements Mark Baugher
- Re: [EME] First cut at eme requirements Saikat Guha