IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emu] WG last call for draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types ?

Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> Fri, 12 August 2022 20:00 UTC

Return-Path: <joe@salowey.net>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AC4C157B43 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 13:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=salowey-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mou3zb4XoKy4 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 13:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E4D5C157B4D for <emu@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 13:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id y23so1877079ljh.12 for <emu@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 13:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=salowey-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=8m646vs+xJsdpYBHkyQTnY5QWV5zCxSMosMMPyXn4cA=; b=4B20eDR06LiTFI5q40de5cBtQ7N3XCYppH5l/6xi1wvwwe5iKov1w8w41LwNkQP2as Y5ht6Zux8Y+N4Y530/zanmy3ZWFdeFNbt5Mnnn5PuYkt3nQ56MytfAwIpwSOllGw6Zk1 S4JkPfLQHDkmwbKXtcciwbZOXA12yb3mkRiAodjn3wMkgf3heXrFx/kHj7LRDkCkzSvZ h2hI4QO7OM0eXyYGBKYenylbRgHJKM0ggmDMylGyuFBkHvfKJ0TdAALIz4bbmviFvJGU tJYRZUB6z3p8Nk7KwE2FOlZaFAcTS0vUZCMjWCAYHTU1QkKWcrmDu+szVqQf0FKqtoBA F3+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=8m646vs+xJsdpYBHkyQTnY5QWV5zCxSMosMMPyXn4cA=; b=dKvy623y5pYujxe6yIwdXmNGrW5lmKNHgoTsidKtufnedvjay68fDGrV13Gm5p1ZEI /2hdKSWKKMKBaHKPzzguRRBIipniKxzcSIRxOydYwY2SY5/28RZMxWYSKe1qL1jGX30B wJaB7448xsfJalXRTNbnT/mf7zcrTsTIRtt+voxv54KivfhujzjfpRyYoGf1/+tfI2gs ctc/2/5EBFaYZ85pIcMrP8MdccrEXp7t9VkEtih+qloWOt8FannvGH6QSw4dQn6UDYAp b4FyW8LlCuubczBhQjw5sTpHLLMhx65LPgJAuYjq3Kh/IOTRxdM/RK30To6Zga5H5gNj oLBg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0Fvc1xQSUN+Wpr8l3VmY/cyUUbqBYEHt/mS9dY4QcWIN239qZF VpQTVhf1i5q3v1TyN+WY9mBlLh5iPmZlA2QBe1rcDzMmzAs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7s9/NnY1SG5ho97riCmoEbX88Ra/VDaeLIZ1Dhqap5mICNuO4ijqhDIogyRyyTLYL/TYl7AZYxab7djIw9r/k=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9555:0:b0:260:3dc:12fb with SMTP id t21-20020a2e9555000000b0026003dc12fbmr1650308ljh.125.1660334453468; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 13:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <325659CB-E36E-4D18-A59C-B5EA54324201@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <325659CB-E36E-4D18-A59C-B5EA54324201@deployingradius.com>
From: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 12:00:42 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOgPGoAYTe0qtFbJhq7S71FpX+k+1=0Gqqq+pwa+1QnBnQ3wrw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
Cc: EMU WG <emu@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004ec79905e610bd6c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/-oRW0-gFKu3ouRAOnxjHA39hJes>
Subject: Re: [Emu] WG last call for draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types ?
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 20:00:56 -0000

On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 4:07 AM Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
wrote:

>   Can we make some progress on the document? There have been no
> substantive comments for a while now.
>
>
[Joe] The chairs are reviewing the status and will have an update next week.


>   The document is finished, the code is interoperable across multiple
> implementations.
>
>
[Joe]  Is the statement in the draft about lack of implementation
experience with EAP-FAST and TEAP still accurate?

You mentioned some interop issues in the meeting, are those issues on the
path to getting resolved?


>   Alan DeKok.
> _______________________________________________
> Emu mailing list
> Emu@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email