IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emu] EMU Meetings

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Tue, 25 January 2022 14:15 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207DE3A13FC for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 06:15:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id llFoZAZ0DOB1 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 06:15:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 746173A13F6 for <emu@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 06:15:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (24-52-251-6.cable.teksavvy.com [24.52.251.6]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E971384; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:15:47 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.20.0.1.32\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOgPGoAikGuhczwoVSth9Nejq5yN7PTiBWRpyBhUFhmubbjc8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 09:15:45 -0500
Cc: EMU WG <emu@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2CDF30DB-7F99-4856-91CA-1AF80747EFF1@deployingradius.com>
References: <CAOgPGoAWz78BfYppQFNQfVXox0mOBA1zb1ccCmHMUm0XZH0UHA@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR0701MB3050E55BBBEBDD67ECA5F98C89559@HE1PR0701MB3050.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <A5257AE5-AB7E-499D-AA7C-FECC38816D2F@deployingradius.com> <HE1PR0701MB3050DF0C6E47F4181E74FE8489599@HE1PR0701MB3050.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <169749C9-5C37-40A3-8434-9B11D928C889@deployingradius.com> <CAOgPGoAikGuhczwoVSth9Nejq5yN7PTiBWRpyBhUFhmubbjc8Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.20.0.1.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/FimoN7Xmqj75tuclvlLeUuliGJc>
Subject: Re: [Emu] EMU Meetings
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 14:15:57 -0000

On Jan 24, 2022, at 11:20 PM, Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> wrote:
> 
> We are requesting a session at IETF 113.  There has not been a whole lot of discussion on the list of any topic. Before scheduling an interim we would like to understand what the topics would be.  
> 
> Do we need an interim for EAP-Types or is it ready for last call?

  I think it's as ready as it's going to be.  PEAP / TTLS is tested by multiple clients and servers.  There's been less feedback on FAST / TEAP.  So either it's correct, or it's not relevant.

> What is the working group interested in meeting on? 

  There's not a lot left which is critical, I think.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email