[Emu] [IANA #1228907] TEAP parameters registry?

Amanda Baber via RT <iana-issues@iana.org> Tue, 19 April 2022 00:03 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAEC73A177C for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FyLk-zmTMhT4 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FECC3A177B for <emu@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C3CE368E; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:03:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5D54F2070E; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:03:45 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <iana-issues@iana.org>
Reply-To: iana-issues@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <03E0BCC8-F5B6-4DC1-8F7E-1DD329CF9BC8@deployingradius.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1228907@icann.org> <03E0BCC8-F5B6-4DC1-8F7E-1DD329CF9BC8@deployingradius.com>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-10999-1650326625-503.1228907-37-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1228907
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
To: aland@deployingradius.com
CC: emu@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:03:45 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/JszZAOXHoZ8J6e513PIDIKFzdWc>
Subject: [Emu] [IANA #1228907] TEAP parameters registry?
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:03:51 -0000

Hi Alan, all,

I have some background information:

The links to EAP-FAST parameters at https://www.iana.org/assignments/eap-numbers weren't part of an attempt to create an authoritative set of links to other EAP registries, but were left there because those registries were moved to https://www.iana.org/assignments/eap-fast-parameters in 2008.

You can see those registries in an early version of eap-numbers:

https://web.archive.org/web/20081007073400/https://www.iana.org/assignments/eap-numbers

However, we were specifically asked to add links to the EAP-NOOB registries. This isn't a usual practice, but we can add further links here if the WG chairs agree.

We don't have a great number of categorization tools available, although we could place registry names in multiple categories at https://www.iana.org/protocols, or consolidate them into fewer categories. (In the future, we should have more sophisticated options, but we don't have an ETA for this.)

Would it be useful for us to label the EAP-FAST links "Moved to [URL]." rather than "See [URL]"?

thanks,

Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager

On Thu Mar 31 19:58:19 2022, aland@deployingradius.com wrote:
> This is a minor NIT, but was confusing.  The EAP numbers page is here:
> 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/eap-numbers/eap-numbers.xhtml
> 
> It contains a link to the EAP-FAST parameters:
> 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/eap-fast-parameters/eap-fast-
> parameters.xhtml
> 
> But there's no similar link for TEAP parameters in that page.
> 
> There is, however. a TEAP parameters registry:
> 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/teap-parameters/teap-parameters.xhtml
> 
> But it's not clear where it's linked from.
> 
> Should we have a link from the EAP numbers page to the TEAP parameters
> page, in the same way as is done for FAST?
> 
> Alan DeKok.