Re: [Emu] Call for EMU agenda Items for IETF 114

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Sat, 09 July 2022 00:28 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B426C157B5D for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 17:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xa_FZZSXLZKg for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 17:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1E7AC15791C for <emu@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 17:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (bras-base-stsvon1503w-grc-35-70-26-170-197.dsl.bell.ca [70.26.170.197]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1124427; Sat, 9 Jul 2022 00:28:49 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOgPGoDSo7EpntddWcVOEaOXkGEH6ktGDHFxuri99z199hMBPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 20:28:46 -0400
Cc: EMU WG <emu@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8BD0A32A-A503-4158-9C92-975D5515EE3B@deployingradius.com>
References: <CAOgPGoAEe9zBntOXiNRudEM-_rfZoUvsJd2m4Y++uUjP+5saVA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOgPGoDSo7EpntddWcVOEaOXkGEH6ktGDHFxuri99z199hMBPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/K39sEzqDWiyKa2yBZOQFOIv0GBY>
Subject: Re: [Emu] Call for EMU agenda Items for IETF 114
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2022 00:28:58 -0000


> On Jul 8, 2022, at 8:13 PM, Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> wrote:
> 
> The EMU meeting is scheduled for  15:00-17:00 Wednesday Session III.  Please let the chairs know if you would like to present.  It would be good to get updates from authors for the current working group items.  

  I can update on interop with TLS 1.3 for other EAP types.  The document could also go to IETF last call, as all open reviews have been addressed.

  I'd like to see if there's interest in my eep-usability draft.  I'll see if I can split it in two, as it's a little large.

  I'll see also if I can have a first draft of a document defining @eap.arpa, which will make unauthenticated EAP-TLS rather a lot more useful.

  Alan DeKok.