IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emu] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Tue, 14 June 2022 22:05 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C77C15948E for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kfh9yQpoIvOl for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F197AC14F747 for <emu@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (216-188-224-5.static.grandenetworks.net [216.188.224.5]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4B392FB; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 22:05:19 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <E6139B0B-0403-4CF1-8341-BF84C65405C2@vigilsec.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 17:05:17 -0500
Cc: Joe Salowey <joe@salowey.net>, EMU WG <emu@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <84521786-4BA1-4927-94AF-C68AA373F591@deployingradius.com>
References: <CAOgPGoCmE-dQ_frOp=vV0Oc=u_=k+QZ3W9JOo_NOwFijiQppqg@mail.gmail.com> <85E7EBEB-A8A7-4BE7-A4F4-3FB759578DE9@vigilsec.com> <9A6481C6-64DC-430A-8E30-857E7971B029@deployingradius.com> <E6139B0B-0403-4CF1-8341-BF84C65405C2@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/Nhbb8n-Bpr9Ysa6TDmDeooWLGHY>
Subject: Re: [Emu] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 22:05:29 -0000

On Jun 14, 2022, at 2:09 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> I think you should just say that: TTLS, PEAP, and FAST each have method-specific application data.

  Done.

> This resolves all of my concerns.

  Thanks.

  I'll push another version of the document at the end of the last call.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email