IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emu] Identities and draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-03

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Tue, 03 August 2021 15:35 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD10C3A2787 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 08:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yIJqGzL6QaH9 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 08:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CEEF3A2784 for <emu@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 08:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.46.129] (24-52-251-6.cable.teksavvy.com [24.52.251.6]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D1DA216; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 15:35:20 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR00MB100665A734958F27868A9F6695F09@SJ0PR00MB1006.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 11:35:19 -0400
Cc: "emu@ietf.org" <emu@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EC62B1BA-E8C9-480E-BC7B-C922AC4A473A@deployingradius.com>
References: <502A7B31-1177-477D-B177-D415BAF67E61@deployingradius.com> <F810992C-CD75-493B-ABFB-F56AB838C90F@deployingradius.com> <CO1PR00MB0996467D20415461A83119EA95EF9@CO1PR00MB0996.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <010AEE0C-2B4B-456B-8022-5FCEF2D6A5CB@deployingradius.com> <SA2PR00MB10024E64C25E84C753A1C78D95F09@SA2PR00MB1002.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <401598CD-BB36-413A-A866-8ADD9EDAC4ED@deployingradius.com> <SJ0PR00MB100665A734958F27868A9F6695F09@SJ0PR00MB1006.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
To: Tim Cappalli <Tim.Cappalli@microsoft.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/RoC1DkCmPLeBHyB9vyrJiJbmaYg>
Subject: Re: [Emu] Identities and draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-03
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 15:35:27 -0000


> On Aug 3, 2021, at 11:15 AM, Tim Cappalli <Tim.Cappalli@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> An EAP identities only apply to 802.1X, so yes.

  What I meant is to ask if sites really do use multiple different realms with EAP, and do so with cloud providers.

  As I said, I haven't seen this use-case, and I haven't anyone discuss it before this conversation.  If it's widely used, then the draft should allow it.  If it's rare to non-existent, then IMHO the draft should suggest it's not a good idea.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email