[Emu] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6677 (6802)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 30 December 2021 10:40 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B623A101D for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 02:40:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B4tZTqSQni55 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 02:40:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B237C3A101A for <emu@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 02:40:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id 432C7119D2; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 02:40:31 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: aid83019@gmail.com, hartmans-ietf@mit.edu, tcc@vt.edu, khoeper@motorolasolutions.com, emu@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20211230104031.432C7119D2@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 02:40:31 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/W7kSox4yWPfgLYbOmD7hWg-AuJk>
Subject: [Emu] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6677 (6802)
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 10:40:36 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6677, "Channel-Binding Support for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Methods". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6802 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Nob Som <aid83019@gmail.com> Section: 6677 Original Text ------------- Technical Corrected Text -------------- Editorial Notes ----- https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6677 (draft-ietf-emu-chbind-16) -------------------------------------- Title : Channel-Binding Support for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Methods Publication Date : July 2012 Author(s) : S. Hartman, Ed., T. Clancy, K. Hoeper Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : EAP Method Update Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Emu] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6677 (6802) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Emu] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6677 (68… Chris Smiley