IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emu] I-D Action: draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-16.txt

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Fri, 11 June 2021 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DCD3A37DB for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 06:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YLPO-Q7G7TFD for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 06:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C0A83A37D4 for <emu@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 06:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.46.129] (24-52-251-6.cable.teksavvy.com [24.52.251.6]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15F0424C; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:39:35 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.6\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <fde152d8-ff88-ea03-cbad-330a302a9442@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 09:39:34 -0400
Cc: "emu@ietf.org" <emu@ietf.org>, Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <49E7E4C8-CB9C-4A96-A7E4-1EE778BD58F5@deployingradius.com>
References: <162341585509.25821.12001005879203873531@ietfa.amsl.com> <fde152d8-ff88-ea03-cbad-330a302a9442@ericsson.com>
To: Mohit Sethi M <mohit.m.sethi=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/X568B7trKSROwU5Ibzx5Zd9bs4s>
Subject: Re: [Emu] I-D Action: draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-16.txt
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:39:42 -0000

On Jun 11, 2021, at 9:08 AM, Mohit Sethi M <mohit.m.sethi=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Chair/AD/EMU:
> 
> We have submitted a new version of draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13 based on the extensive feedback from Alan Dekok, Heikki Vatiainen, and Oleg Pekar.
> 
> Can we somehow prioritize this document and move it forward? The authors have received several offline emails inquiring about the publication timeline.
> 
> Any remaining issues in the current draft can be addressed together with the comments from the AD review and the IETF last call. 

  I have sent a separate message re-iterating my previous detailed review, much of which remains unaddressed.

  I suggest that the authors prioritize working towards WG consensus.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email