IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emu] I-D Action: draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-03.txt

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Mon, 18 October 2021 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052BA3A040D for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PDJL_Go7d2Fv for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:17:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BB233A0522 for <emu@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 12:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.20.33] (unknown [75.98.136.132]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D290E263; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:17:16 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0701MB3050C24B0A6ABA21FDC5834989BC9@HE1PR0701MB3050.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 15:17:15 -0400
Cc: EMU WG <emu@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <76EB0820-2D12-4C93-B533-FB8367791BB8@deployingradius.com>
References: <162436723201.12723.6983813765527840733@ietfa.amsl.com> <60B729CE-9A89-4EE3-9D2F-6C91DA2222B3@deployingradius.com> <HE1PR0701MB3050DCD2E3B8190E3A306DE689089@HE1PR0701MB3050.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <HE1PR0701MB3050C24B0A6ABA21FDC5834989BC9@HE1PR0701MB3050.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/_OBIp--nGQsWqgCCiHKxqQAH-9U>
Subject: Re: [Emu] I-D Action: draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-03.txt
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:17:28 -0000

On Oct 18, 2021, at 2:46 PM, John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> What is the status and plan for this document? To me it still seems like it is more or less done and ready for WGLC.

  Implementors are doing final interoperability testing on client && server implementations.  We hope to have updates within a few weeks,

>  I agree with Alan that it would be good if it is published quite soon after EAP-TLS 1.3. It is important to begin transitioning all the TLS based EAP methods to TLS 1.3.

  I agree.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email