Re: [Emu] Final 2 notes on draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-03.txt
Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Wed, 25 May 2022 11:51 UTC
Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A74C1850E8 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2022 04:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NU5XXbkbTAT2 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2022 04:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93F3BC1850E2 for <emu@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2022 04:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (23-233-27-102.cpe.pppoe.ca [23.233.27.102]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B74C232 for <emu@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2022 11:50:35 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 07:50:33 -0400
References: <94E5D599-C68A-466F-8186-BEF9D8BA914A@deployingradius.com>
To: EMU WG <emu@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <94E5D599-C68A-466F-8186-BEF9D8BA914A@deployingradius.com>
Message-Id: <CDAA1241-ACAB-455C-B563-8EEBF470D615@deployingradius.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/ejBlJcTZL6BOj7BuBqZphzRsoC0>
Subject: Re: [Emu] Final 2 notes on draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-03.txt
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 11:51:16 -0000
On Mar 23, 2022, at 1:02 PM, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> wrote: > 2) the draft should be updated to add a note that when a supplicant sends PAP/CHAP for phase 2 of TTLS, the expected responses are: > > EAP-Success > EAP-Failure > Ongoing TLS negotiation, with a resumption ticket. > > At least one implementation expects success/failure, and treats ongoing TLS negotiation as a failure. > > If we squint hard, we could view the resumption ticket as a "protected success indicator". So it might be worth adding that it's a good idea to send, even if the server has no intention of doing resumption. > > If there are no objections or comments, I'll update the draft with some text saying the above. I'll issue a new version next week. A little more than a week later, I've updated the draft. There are no other open issues I'm aware of. The document is ready for LC. Alan DeKok.