IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emu] [TLS] Fwd: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 05 January 2021 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310CA3A0E44; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 08:05:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X6XoKRPN2ef8; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 08:05:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 440E73A0DE4; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 08:05:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28923898B; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 11:06:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id UuG_2HxoMoqd; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 11:06:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65CB338984; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 11:06:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2392152; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 11:05:46 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
cc: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, Mohit Sethi M <mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com>, "emu@ietf.org" <emu@ietf.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <5E1CF713-D917-4E9A-869F-21A4174D0562@deployingradius.com>
References: <160815821055.25925.15897627611548078426@ietfa.amsl.com> <20201216223842.GR64351@kduck.mit.edu> <0f2b05db-5c98-43d4-aae3-cf620814bacc@www.fastmail.com> <7745bb87-a946-c739-007d-9d3be1212e19@ericsson.com> <bddc3a92-acd1-46cc-84ad-aea013c544cf@www.fastmail.com> <5E1CF713-D917-4E9A-869F-21A4174D0562@deployingradius.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 11:05:46 -0500
Message-ID: <28008.1609862746@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/hlq4_nLSior54Fks51carajsWeo>
Subject: Re: [Emu] [TLS] Fwd: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 16:05:54 -0000

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> wrote:
    > Therefore, we need an explicit signal to the EAP-TLS layer that the

Do you mean, "to the EAP layer"?
s/EAP-TLS layer/EAP/ ??

    > EAP-TLS method has finished.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email