Re: [Emu] EAP-TLS 1.3 Section 2.2 text

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 17 May 2021 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C5F3A369F for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 May 2021 05:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iX09EyauOl8X for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 May 2021 05:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A69F3A369E for <emu@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 May 2021 05:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3131; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1621255606; x=1622465206; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=plRMezoxQHwkhGM99sstPynI8LAleof1Yg9JTaehK8E=; b=Pn3bj2HLsjWhYpKHwdZhwiJCwUvQA4EZ2T3HcMuTO7Uh11XTTGw6Xtes TwSPgY93xe80CbaE+nZ/m4jzy0gikJJxfLJwg0heQUOI9qrvmExW9tZZ5 COqBuQnD3CuMDbQqf4Fw4Ji6MtY2dbA0ZhItrEoA2cZAthZ0Gl/2NSDq5 A=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ADAABGZKJglxbLJq1aGgEBAQEBAQEBAQEDAQEBARIBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAgIBAQEBQIFFAwEBAQELAYEiglUBOTGNS4h1iAeMYoYsgXwEBwEBAQoDA?= =?us-ascii?q?QFBBAEBhE8CgXUmNgcOAgQBAQEBAwIDAQEBAQUBAQUBAQECAQYEFAEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBaIVdhkQBAQEDAXkFCwsEAQcMLj0aBhOCcQGCZiGoUHiBNIEBhGOEYRCBO?= =?us-ascii?q?gGBUoU0hlxDgg2BFScMEIIwLz6IEIItBIUxn1WdJYMgg0uBSZgxBSOlPY9Jp?= =?us-ascii?q?WMBhAsCBAYFAhaBWwMugVszGggbFTsqAYI+PhIZDo44jjY/Ay84AgYKAQEDC?= =?us-ascii?q?Y0QAQE?=
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:GI8ITKEkwRW26i9bpLqE7ceALOsnbusQ8zAXPo5KOH9om62j+/ xG88576faZslwssTQb+exoRpPsfZqsz/FICOAqVN/IYOClghrMEGgI1+XfKlPbak/DH5ZmpM Ndm2wUMqyXMbC85vyKhzWFLw==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,307,1613433600"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="36075893"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 17 May 2021 12:46:42 +0000
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([10.61.144.50]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 14HCkfBi015864 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 17 May 2021 12:46:41 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <8A7D73CD-AF31-4932-8C96-9D7A09BC20C4@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DF29877D-48D3-486C-B54A-78666A4618ED"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\))
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 14:46:36 +0200
In-Reply-To: <9206028C-7CE2-4A90-BFD4-AFCD5FBDA7DE@deployingradius.com>
Cc: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>, EMU WG <emu@ietf.org>
To: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
References: <CAOgPGoBDcbDxGB3_Qy_xXymhnxrfMaOPNP545eMh8XLvU6OX+A@mail.gmail.com> <92D9824F-82C2-440F-807F-7B4799DCF1B6@deployingradius.com> <CAOgPGoAd3CcaqPYd0aYXBDtCmv32T8hpGH+6ysEn7Pi9M+FSiw@mail.gmail.com> <9206028C-7CE2-4A90-BFD4-AFCD5FBDA7DE@deployingradius.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.144.50, [10.61.144.50]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/joE04Wewjb5Mg86g7F3bT9RX7Ag>
Subject: Re: [Emu] EAP-TLS 1.3 Section 2.2 text
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 12:46:52 -0000

Let this be the biggest argument on this list ;-)

> On 17 May 2021, at 14:44, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>  This is just a personal preference, but "MUST NOT" is clearer to me than SHALL NOT.  It's also more used, IIRC.