Re: [Emu] I-D Action: draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-03.txt

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Mon, 17 January 2022 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F26B3A1571 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 06:09:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WNtNuFfw3vKP for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 06:08:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C5A33A156B for <emu@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 06:08:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (24-52-251-6.cable.teksavvy.com [24.52.251.6]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0779F821; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 14:08:55 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.20.0.1.32\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0701MB305057552F06976414A59D3989559@HE1PR0701MB3050.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 09:08:54 -0500
Cc: "emu@ietf.org" <emu@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <81DA6D71-DEC1-4782-B874-E9BC779EADE3@deployingradius.com>
References: <HE1PR0701MB305057552F06976414A59D3989559@HE1PR0701MB3050.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.20.0.1.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/l4jgkE5KP0go8MkzjAsNE0jGR1k>
Subject: Re: [Emu] I-D Action: draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-03.txt
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 14:09:01 -0000

On Jan 15, 2022, at 5:53 AM, John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> On Oct 18, 2021, Alan DeKok wrote:
>  
> >Implementors are doing final interoperability testing on client && server
> >implementations.  We hope to have updates within a few weeks,
>  
> Any updates on this? I think this is a very important draft. TLS 1.2 is obsolete and NIST requires use of TLS 1.3 everywhere from January 2024. Would be good if the draft could at least be resubmitted. It expired in December. People outside of the IETF sometimes thinks that means it is no longer worked on.

  I'll issue an update shortly.  There will be minor typo fixes, and an implementation report section added.

  The main blocker at this point is content / testing for EAP-FAST and TEAP.  EAP-TLS, TTLS, and PEAP are widely implemented, and tested to be interoperable.

  If the WG decides that the document can go ahead without an implementation report for FAST / TEAP, then I would suggest starting a WG last call as soon as the next revision is issued.

  Alan DeKok.