Re: [Emu] Question for draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-03

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Mon, 28 June 2021 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F653A0CCB for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id plWUY3KkB9Sa for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32C343A0CC6 for <emu@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.46.129] (24-52-251-6.cable.teksavvy.com [24.52.251.6]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAA6F1DA; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 19:52:27 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABXxEz8EBUz_y1FmQTE9C8cpF+3vqy-mPCx8CnyUMZ72pNifAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 15:52:26 -0400
Cc: EMU WG <emu@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <45CA07C5-FA7D-4FCF-B399-B33DE450C677@deployingradius.com>
References: <DB6D339A-710C-4EC4-9F8E-4B8602632AE1@deployingradius.com> <CABXxEz8EBUz_y1FmQTE9C8cpF+3vqy-mPCx8CnyUMZ72pNifAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Oleg Pekar <oleg.pekar.2017@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/mlGg3BpVWIjvitGeYr-EzfCfRPc>
Subject: Re: [Emu] Question for draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-03
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 19:52:32 -0000

On Jun 28, 2021, at 11:18 AM, Oleg Pekar <oleg.pekar.2017@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Alan, agree on the MAC randomization problem. Is there any existing standard or proposal for the network deployments where the Network Access Control server needs to track the device with randomized MAC moving between intranet SSIDs? 

  Not that I know of.

> About usage of physical MAC address - maybe some client systems will not have access to the physical MAC rather than just to a randomized MAC. 

  That is true.  My goal here is not to make things perfect, but to be able to manage a device, when that's possible.

  Alan DeKok.