IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579:

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Fri, 01 April 2022 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0C03A1731; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 07:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mhK2UuQKP7PX; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 07:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [185.32.222.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E3833A17B2; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 07:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.227] (77-58-144-232.dclient.hispeed.ch [77.58.144.232]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-18) with ESMTPSA id 231EuwN3018517 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Apr 2022 16:56:58 +0200
Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1648825019; bh=+sDn/XrN7B5cVb2pJ4f+OhfSk5dNxV5nJKM7Ybg3NCI=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=B8G8w/qZSeM5rQjNM0viA9iQH8e6YNEwN5VN7MPqIDxaATjRKoxisvgmQtHxSR6qR MtyN63coreGoVZbT2WVdly5sPpU32H7L6ZdPLeca7zzO/JuL/ao2pgIas9pkmOreeb 4gJS82yI4VytTWnD+Qw0JmOKIg7cRp0SsCnQ/RRQ=
Message-ID: <c9d89489-522e-2fac-85a5-ce7dd2e1acad@lear.ch>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 16:56:55 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Cc: radext@ietf.org, emu-ads@ietf.org, EMU WG <emu@ietf.org>, "Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
References: <fbc6e33a-fa6a-ba2c-0840-700116a6a182@rfc-editor.org> <CAOW+2dvuh2r-qbKM0h-qohTOpCiUy_U58vi22nNiXJs4cOjUBA@mail.gmail.com> <7FEC9E12-846B-4218-8F29-F6839243B8C2@deployingradius.com> <CAOW+2dudRkygc8PPobWgUNZd7n5v6YsJGVJjRZDoM_pwvnxFOg@mail.gmail.com> <35F3907F-9EDD-45D7-B2CB-101FD02FE642@deployingradius.com> <1cab955a-1379-d191-0d44-81d2c355d231@rfc-editor.org> <fcee4ae2-5d48-697c-d92c-1d204652fb41@rfc-editor.org> <CAOW+2dtUV6uwP8xR2o=c7sLpykLi4j9rARXHJ1HNyr=5cSevHg@mail.gmail.com> <6C5442C1-2291-4464-AB7E-1105FC290575@deployingradius.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
In-Reply-To: <6C5442C1-2291-4464-AB7E-1105FC290575@deployingradius.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------GJSXsSrTM87XVdMHjaGW6j5w"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/qBxiXpX2gzgwke6Twc1pCFrgDf0>
Subject: Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579:
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 14:57:31 -0000

Ok.  I've updated the errata text.

On 01.04.22 14:16, Alan DeKok wrote:
>    +1
>
>    Other than that, they look OK, thanks.
>
>> On Apr 1, 2022, at 1:16 AM, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think the note in eid6259 is now superfluous.  Can we remove it?
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:09 PM Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>> Corrected URLs below:
>>
>> On 01.04.22 06:48, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) wrote:
>>> Ok.
>>>
>>> I have edited – but not yet verified – the two errata accordingly.
>>> Please see:
>>>
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6154
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6259
> _______________________________________________
> Emu mailing list
> Emu@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email