Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579:
"Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 01 April 2022 05:09 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2746C3A12D6; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 22:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rF-_rKn59xnc; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 22:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.61.145.21] (unknown [173.38.220.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 611B33A123F; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 22:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <fcee4ae2-5d48-697c-d92c-1d204652fb41@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 07:07:31 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Content-Language: en-US
From: "Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
To: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Cc: radext@ietf.org, EMU WG <emu@ietf.org>, emu-ads@ietf.org
References: <fbc6e33a-fa6a-ba2c-0840-700116a6a182@rfc-editor.org> <CAOW+2dvuh2r-qbKM0h-qohTOpCiUy_U58vi22nNiXJs4cOjUBA@mail.gmail.com> <7FEC9E12-846B-4218-8F29-F6839243B8C2@deployingradius.com> <CAOW+2dudRkygc8PPobWgUNZd7n5v6YsJGVJjRZDoM_pwvnxFOg@mail.gmail.com> <35F3907F-9EDD-45D7-B2CB-101FD02FE642@deployingradius.com> <1cab955a-1379-d191-0d44-81d2c355d231@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <1cab955a-1379-d191-0d44-81d2c355d231@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/qED9duV_RRBrYzdvJk-sgDIjwkE>
Subject: Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579:
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 05:09:02 -0000
Corrected URLs below: On 01.04.22 06:48, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) wrote: > Ok. > > I have edited – but not yet verified – the two errata accordingly. > Please see: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6154 > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6259 > > Are there any further edits that are required? > > Eliot (ISE) > > On 01.04.22 00:52, Alan DeKok wrote: >> On Mar 31, 2022, at 4:40 PM, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Alan suggested: >>> " EAP-Start is indicated by sending an EAP-Message attribute with a >>> length of 3. The single byte of data SHOULD be set to zero on >>> transmission and MUST be ignored on receipt. RADIUS clients >>> MUST NOT >>> send EAP-Message attributes of length 2, as attributes with no >>> value >>> are not permitted in RADIUS. However, for historical reasons >>> and for >>> compatibility with existing practice, RADIUS servers MUST accept >>> EAP-Messages >>> of length 2, and treat them as EAP-Start. >>> >>> Just checking the source I have locally, the server accepts >>> zero-length EAP-Message (or any other text/string attribute, for >>> that matter). So that's fine." >>> >>> [BA] This suggested errata text looks good. >> Thanks. >> >>> [BA] This text is better. The implicit assumption here is that the >>> NAS is sending an EAP-Request with a locally implemented EAP type, >>> without talking to the RADIUS server. Of course, the same thing >>> could happen if the RADIUS server uses an inappropriate default >>> type. So perhaps this might work: >>> >>> " Where the initial EAP-Request sent by the NAS is for an >>> authentication Type (4 or greater), the peer MAY respond with a Nak >>> indicating that it would prefer another authentication method. In >>> this >>> case, the NAS should send an Access-Request encapsulating the >>> received EAP-Response/Nak. This allows a peer to suggest another >>> EAP method where the NAS is configured to send a default EAP >>> type (such as MD5-Challenge) which may not be appropriate." >> That looks good to me, thanks. >> >> Alan DeKok. >> > > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu >
- [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579: Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)
- Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579: Oleg Pekar
- Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579: Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579: Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579: Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579: Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579: Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579: Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)
- Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579: Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)
- Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579: Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579: Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579: Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)
- Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579: Eliot Lear
- Re: [Emu] EAP Erratum 6154 on RFC 3579: Oleg Pekar