Re: [Emu] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-emu-eap-session-id-04: (with COMMENT)
Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Wed, 03 June 2020 13:06 UTC
Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037353A0AB7; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 06:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id txkSXZqcf5yX; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 06:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CEB63A0AB6; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 06:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.46.130] (24-52-251-6.cable.teksavvy.com [24.52.251.6]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08D7664F; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 13:06:51 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <159115288456.10873.12340295955718946084@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 09:06:51 -0400
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-emu-eap-session-id@ietf.org, Mohit Sethi M <mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com>, emu-chairs@ietf.org, emu@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8D9D73D6-6A88-420B-9862-623D9BD71C31@deployingradius.com>
References: <159115288456.10873.12340295955718946084@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/s9MnzkqaWRnGJilJ_lOGNYkydnw>
Subject: Re: [Emu] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-emu-eap-session-id-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 13:06:57 -0000
On Jun 2, 2020, at 10:54 PM, Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > — Section 2 — > > This section updates [RFC5247] ... > It further > defines Session-ID derivation for PEAP. > > This section does not address PEAP; that’s done in Section 3. I suggest > removing that last sentence. Done. > — Section 3 — > > [RFC5247] did not define Session-Id definition for Microsoft's > Protected EAP (PEAP). For consistency with EAP-TLS the definition > given in [RFC5216] Section 2.3, we define it as: > > Both sentences here need some fixing: > > NEW > [RFC5247] did not define Session-Id for Microsoft's > Protected EAP (PEAP). For consistency with the EAP-TLS definition > given in [RFC5216] Section 2.3, we define it as: > END Done. Thanks. Alan DeKok.
- [Emu] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-em… Barry Leiba via Datatracker
- Re: [Emu] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-iet… Alan DeKok