[Emu] draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types
Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Wed, 16 February 2022 14:49 UTC
Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0050A3A1359
for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 06:49:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id QkiBgOFaizW5 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 16 Feb 2022 06:49:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64D963A1352
for <emu@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 06:49:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (24-52-251-6.cable.teksavvy.com [24.52.251.6])
by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAFF4354
for <emu@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:49:30 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
header.from=deployingradius.com
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
Message-Id: <6FD05D37-052C-4043-9BE7-DDA2043147EB@deployingradius.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 09:49:28 -0500
To: EMU WG <emu@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/uB0vZ575Bd1_-cvk4f1e8-GkHQs>
Subject: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>,
<mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>,
<mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:49:37 -0000
The draft seems ready. The major implementors have either verified that they're inter-operable, or don't seem to be bothered with the current draft. There's been no discussion since the last revision. That revision contains text which last last discussed in August. And there was minimal discussion on it since then. Can we issue a WGLC, and get it published? Alan DeKok.
- [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types John Mattsson
- Re: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types Joseph Salowey