[Emu] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-emu-eap-session-id-04: (with COMMENT)
Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 03 June 2020 02:54 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: emu@ietf.org
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E64A3A082E; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 19:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-emu-eap-session-id@ietf.org, emu-chairs@ietf.org, emu@ietf.org, Mohit Sethi <mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com>, mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.1.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Message-ID: <159115288456.10873.12340295955718946084@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 19:54:44 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/zjW-872Kyyb0tVJ5bDwi69Yt6ag>
Subject: [Emu] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-emu-eap-session-id-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 02:54:45 -0000
Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-emu-eap-session-id-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-eap-session-id/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- — Section 2 — This section updates [RFC5247] ... It further defines Session-ID derivation for PEAP. This section does not address PEAP; that’s done in Section 3. I suggest removing that last sentence. — Section 3 — [RFC5247] did not define Session-Id definition for Microsoft's Protected EAP (PEAP). For consistency with EAP-TLS the definition given in [RFC5216] Section 2.3, we define it as: Both sentences here need some fixing: NEW [RFC5247] did not define Session-Id for Microsoft's Protected EAP (PEAP). For consistency with the EAP-TLS definition given in [RFC5216] Section 2.3, we define it as: END
- [Emu] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-em… Barry Leiba via Datatracker
- Re: [Emu] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-iet… Alan DeKok