Re: [Endymail] We're not done yet
carlo von lynX <lynX@i.know.you.are.psyced.org> Tue, 18 November 2014 12:39 UTC
Return-Path: <lynx@lo.psyced.org>
X-Original-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECA51A0369 for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 04:39:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45Sd_-OTZBD3 for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 04:39:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lo.psyced.org (lost.in.psyced.org [188.40.42.221]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C75C1A0364 for <endymail@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 04:39:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lo.psyced.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lo.psyced.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id sAICdIXY020415 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <endymail@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:39:20 +0100
Received: (from lynx@localhost) by lo.psyced.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id sAICdHlC020414 for endymail@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:39:17 +0100
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:39:15 +0100
From: carlo von lynX <lynX@i.know.you.are.psyced.org>
To: endymail@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20141118123913.GA20077@lo.psyced.org>
References: <CACsn0ck-bueehMDjgx-Co=bL0pLkeJM=Fqc0T_SDT4bdX4nzPg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0ck-bueehMDjgx-Co=bL0pLkeJM=Fqc0T_SDT4bdX4nzPg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/endymail/H2BlHxgBKuG_DH94lgWM6OrPkSM
Subject: Re: [Endymail] We're not done yet
X-BeenThere: endymail@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <endymail.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/endymail/>
List-Post: <mailto:endymail@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:39:22 -0000
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 09:27:58PM -0800, Watson Ladd wrote: > So if I could summarize the problems they are: > > 1: keys are hard > 2: spam is hard > 3: discovery is hard. >From my point of view these are all very solvable problems, but that is because I stand looking from a technologically completely different place. In the following contribution I describe how either Distributed Social Graph or the GNU Name System or a combination of the two can be used to solve the three problems listed above quite nicely. https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/messaging/2014/001081.html Please ask any questions if there are any logical building blocks missing. Probably there are. Or check out documents on http://secushare.org
- Re: [Endymail] We're not done yet Viktor Dukhovni
- [Endymail] We're not done yet Watson Ladd
- Re: [Endymail] We're not done yet Paul Wouters
- Re: [Endymail] We're not done yet Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Endymail] We're not done yet Paul Wouters
- Re: [Endymail] We're not done yet Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Endymail] We're not done yet Watson Ladd
- Re: [Endymail] We're not done yet Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Endymail] We're not done yet Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Endymail] We're not done yet carlo von lynX
- Re: [Endymail] We're not done yet Dave Crocker