Re: [Endymail] Why S/MIME and OpenPGP ecosystems fall short
Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Tue, 02 June 2015 09:49 UTC
Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909D21A907F for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 02:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nebZHv3398KM for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 02:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from strange.aox.org (strange.aox.org [IPv6:2001:4d88:100c::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A7961B29D8 for <endymail@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 02:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strange.aox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD0AFA0065; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 09:49:01 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gulbrandsen.priv.no; s=mail; t=1433238541; bh=WuYfaeckL6pgZBLPXkLW5F4njMJTVvP7mHqWCd0W1jc=; h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:From; b=q4E5Wqg3vHHrjuXplW04UQfVYWyFXkWtJ+9SIPof9FSTRTXNSRugLXgRcDDzNOuHK eMiNxSue1EVRKGBrjN7CFDpIHkyeFnCzy4tkuGv+o7lL8qCCZU4EV/27avJMf+1L20 pcqLGJL9QwZDcH6Tm+W3SEgbs+pwB6kutCHz+mqk=
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1433238540-28872-28871/12/38; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 09:49:00 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>, endymail@ietf.org
Message-Id: <EBki7WFib38o/GuwWcynetKjdsyFQKqu+TC5JQp412c=.sha-256@antelope.email>
References: <CACsn0c=1RfwZF3-ynoaer=QkRXE56Mzwe1y50QQirW=GMBwvYA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:49:00 +0000
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/endymail/VRwMHRQzeylGH0Tjv-xisRMp_ns>
Subject: Re: [Endymail] Why S/MIME and OpenPGP ecosystems fall short
X-BeenThere: endymail@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <endymail.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/endymail/>
List-Post: <mailto:endymail@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:49:05 -0000
Agreed. But: Good luck. The GPG fans will fight you every step of the way. Arnt
- [Endymail] Why S/MIME and OpenPGP ecosystems fall… Watson Ladd
- Re: [Endymail] Why S/MIME and OpenPGP ecosystems … Arnt Gulbrandsen
- [Endymail] Why S/MIME and OpenPGP ecosystems fall… Tom Ritter
- Re: [Endymail] Why S/MIME and OpenPGP ecosystems … Michael Kjörling
- Re: [Endymail] Why S/MIME and OpenPGP ecosystems … Arnt Gulbrandsen