Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 07 September 2014 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986FD1A064B for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 09:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.563
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IOMaK21Sq8nu for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 09:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09E6C1A046A for <endymail@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 09:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 64176 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2014 16:40:47 -0000
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 7 Sep 2014 16:40:47 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=3973.540c8a8f.k1409; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=bgfnBsvEYL2G72abDJzjml1L0gDlnWc07azEiI0aLok=; b=wMpDYxOdE6gIKnDc04E38QTmOtjWgQLbYD1Rr8OIEBUfwXuLifbJalXYv5QA5cBvdDqCvy7r8k+LAku0Hsp+vVCu56vmpBnM08CcOkjAb4FFeGQmoSxmT1PAwECKObXjqwAN9lc2vunnsy5L79Be9RSSwMXjD+ziut63TTxq18EQncJyzuLpm6krFaH1+tfA8gEw41juPfejfFy1vc5igJNjho91tTYJd37bf4n5UK3UF2bPNXNHThEPK/+5xkJ2
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=3973.540c8a8f.k1409; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=bgfnBsvEYL2G72abDJzjml1L0gDlnWc07azEiI0aLok=; b=CXxQNX89G/YtBXFr3xXXf3NUN0OXQt9K1fozfDEQeyVb3mARYJSUUY8rpFQTkcw+JKUwsckxKSUu3DWECImAAIkU4SdRdYLpMbMJAHYSo0f0KpRLvXL77eDqyE1YaEgPKdng/16CJJMuh0oofpLcSJ7SDPIEsKopn8gPTntGE59aIVzHJ0rEJNHr6D3x0bGuPQlDkNyxvZWmB8t0iOS8LFC73he2YyIGsjkGPzysivh/NvKg/zoUHh7b+/li/mFv
Date: 7 Sep 2014 16:40:25 -0000
Message-ID: <20140907164025.14706.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: endymail@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <540C826B.9060408@gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/endymail/X7pk3sheZXPhsocUsCUoBqPIoYA
Cc: dcrocker@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext
X-BeenThere: endymail@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <endymail.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/endymail/>
List-Post: <mailto:endymail@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 16:40:50 -0000

>I've no idea what characteristics of 'transactional mail' -- as compared
>with... personal mail, or ? -- worth distinguishing.

It only goes in one direction.  My bank writes to me all the time, but
I never write back.  This rules out any approach that uses an exchange
of messages to establish mutual trust.  

An obvious kludge would be some way for the bank to send you their key
out of band, analogous to the notes on websites now that say please
add our address notify@bigbank.ru to your address book.

R's,
John