Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 07 September 2014 16:40 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986FD1A064B
for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 09:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.563
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id IOMaK21Sq8nu for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 7 Sep 2014 09:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net
[IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09E6C1A046A
for <endymail@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 09:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 64176 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2014 16:40:47 -0000
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18)
by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 7 Sep 2014 16:40:47 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com;
h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
s=3973.540c8a8f.k1409; i=johnl@user.iecc.com;
bh=bgfnBsvEYL2G72abDJzjml1L0gDlnWc07azEiI0aLok=;
b=wMpDYxOdE6gIKnDc04E38QTmOtjWgQLbYD1Rr8OIEBUfwXuLifbJalXYv5QA5cBvdDqCvy7r8k+LAku0Hsp+vVCu56vmpBnM08CcOkjAb4FFeGQmoSxmT1PAwECKObXjqwAN9lc2vunnsy5L79Be9RSSwMXjD+ziut63TTxq18EQncJyzuLpm6krFaH1+tfA8gEw41juPfejfFy1vc5igJNjho91tTYJd37bf4n5UK3UF2bPNXNHThEPK/+5xkJ2
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com;
h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
s=3973.540c8a8f.k1409; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com;
bh=bgfnBsvEYL2G72abDJzjml1L0gDlnWc07azEiI0aLok=;
b=CXxQNX89G/YtBXFr3xXXf3NUN0OXQt9K1fozfDEQeyVb3mARYJSUUY8rpFQTkcw+JKUwsckxKSUu3DWECImAAIkU4SdRdYLpMbMJAHYSo0f0KpRLvXL77eDqyE1YaEgPKdng/16CJJMuh0oofpLcSJ7SDPIEsKopn8gPTntGE59aIVzHJ0rEJNHr6D3x0bGuPQlDkNyxvZWmB8t0iOS8LFC73he2YyIGsjkGPzysivh/NvKg/zoUHh7b+/li/mFv
Date: 7 Sep 2014 16:40:25 -0000
Message-ID: <20140907164025.14706.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: endymail@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <540C826B.9060408@gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/endymail/X7pk3sheZXPhsocUsCUoBqPIoYA
Cc: dcrocker@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext
X-BeenThere: endymail@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <endymail.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/endymail>,
<mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/endymail/>
List-Post: <mailto:endymail@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail>,
<mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 16:40:50 -0000
>I've no idea what characteristics of 'transactional mail' -- as compared >with... personal mail, or ? -- worth distinguishing. It only goes in one direction. My bank writes to me all the time, but I never write back. This rules out any approach that uses an exchange of messages to establish mutual trust. An obvious kludge would be some way for the bank to send you their key out of band, analogous to the notes on websites now that say please add our address notify@bigbank.ru to your address book. R's, John
- [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Eliot Lear
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Eliot Lear
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext John Levine
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Pete Resnick
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Dave Crocker
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Pete Resnick
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Eliot Lear
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Dave Crocker
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Dave Crocker
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Dave Crocker
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext John Levine
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Watson Ladd
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext John Levine
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Eliot Lear
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Endymail] where's the end, was spam versus c… John Levine
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] where's the end, was spam versus c… Watson Ladd
- Re: [Endymail] where's the end, was spam versus c… John R Levine
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Pete Resnick
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext John R Levine
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Werner Koch
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Brandon Long
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Leo Vegoda
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Dave Crocker
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext John R Levine
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Dave Crocker
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext John R Levine
- Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext Dave Crocker