IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 09 September 2014 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8021A8850 for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.137
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mq7-MEXRCUTo for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40E1C1A884C for <endymail@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 79263 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2014 18:19:23 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=1359e.540f44ab.k1409; bh=9CTQ+R8ahpkkGeqYFciZ3kh298Tp9IBKeW4i84w/mv0=; b=dbor7h3TWojodIYTFlmW9x97whDM4LjidJpKqI44R8MjGJDsDwX1TJPWpp7CYN51cr8M+u/sA5WZVLL6cXaGGr9WnHFzE4RhARgUDb5WCJYo1pI0ab4i6zZ1+4orAy4YxEWuSzmA9dyXa2OdmEVM4Gpc/QR+K7PMMdylOK1Ag6e6vW9yI0MKUvj55M6vmsHoKOpjxVVBeX3kIXC6INedeUdkMebnvtpBfqyzMn6YiqIyNfMZM6EHyPcGphtoMsLq
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=1359e.540f44ab.k1409; bh=9CTQ+R8ahpkkGeqYFciZ3kh298Tp9IBKeW4i84w/mv0=; b=sW1IhFVuEn3CcH1f5iYC/+NJbiqq6/f96ngmzAI3xSx240/dyWZdja7V0ziGtpY3P/NP0iHSzAH8d7tVLAsHyrFlVKf2TjDZZaUvAATO2XoNgy/ZjVVuF5CnRNxIcUweDDb7lkeSuX1Rub7QScRQQiEqLwcNWE33zLF0UKwAGjjHQ2hRkOyaCi77aC87VGJ8/J5r3plIpK7zDhVVczbW0CGvU4itiPDQeCVM40TzG5y0yFlU4g0mDSDj9HVAl1La
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 09 Sep 2014 18:19:23 -0000
Date: 9 Sep 2014 14:19:22 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1409091418400.3796@joyce.lan>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <540F4063.5080304@gmail.com>
References: <20140907170207.14888.qmail@joyce.lan> <540F39F2.1040801@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1409091350310.1894@joyce.lan> <540F4063.5080304@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/endymail/cbah-GrijmeO7O3WG9yo2qwd1yY
Cc: endymail@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext
X-BeenThere: endymail@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <endymail.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/endymail/>
List-Post: <mailto:endymail@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 18:19:25 -0000

> You made a simple, flat assertion.

Yup, about SMTP time rejection based just on DKIM failure.  Other than 
DMARC, I don't know anyone who does that.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email