IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Endymail] spam versus cleartext

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Sat, 06 September 2014 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487C91A6F6D for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 23:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.253
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.253 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VGXYgqzseOpQ for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 23:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 574A41A00E4 for <endymail@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 23:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1290; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1409985532; x=1411195132; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject; bh=qoTBw7gl6w6ez6eOZ+UUAq9WDQS5mzdj4kCPZRh7CPc=; b=ePNJTvZ3MhRNlMZpkvf71cA4EWpehGKXM7hj7iAaVN7Y1eDXWS3UdLa3 AzaX+9s3DL7wznYxInXH5gsh8jDTH2gL6zHPKX/7mA86BcIw8BwK2V0MY xvJfWWHZ+iNhoTwnjB4f/vpIlRiLbGAk8ZCOdOGNq0EpsM79ffaNRSPYM Q=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 486
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoQLACGrClStJssW/2dsb2JhbABagyU7V4J8smCTTIhnd4QtVT0WCwILAwIBAgE/GQgBAYg+DZpXjy+VKgETBI58AQFsgmOBUwEEhQoCjjiBSmCGfoc8jWqDYzsvgQ+BQAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,478,1406592000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="167989426"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Sep 2014 06:38:49 +0000
Received: from [10.61.93.218] (ams3-vpn-dhcp7643.cisco.com [10.61.93.218]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s866cmsE005929 for <endymail@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 06:38:49 GMT
Message-ID: <540AABF8.8000605@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 08:38:48 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: endymail@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XgDnW7GugIejroda5WRvRC9FHW4lRaeQe"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/endymail/hhkjyvDWBJcS6uEqsDXeqFCEeIk
Subject: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext
X-BeenThere: endymail@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <endymail.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/endymail/>
List-Post: <mailto:endymail@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 06:38:54 -0000

Hi everyone,

In the early days fo perpass we had lengthy discussions about the
tension between privacy and ability of security systems to reduce spam. 
Below is an article from a gentleman who used to work at Google, which I
thought this group might find interesting.

https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/messaging/2014/000780.html

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email