Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and what the IETF could do
Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Mon, 01 September 2014 17:16 UTC
Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2391A03DE
for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 10:16:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
J_CHICKENPOX_72=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id FXjaEe97wKed for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 1 Sep 2014 10:16:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f171.google.com (mail-vc0-f171.google.com
[209.85.220.171])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 254781A0537
for <endymail@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 10:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id id10so5803528vcb.30
for <endymail@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 10:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
bh=v4a+DeVP62kluVNvEF8kSsDsx3gAwCrGfiSI+o2XdJ4=;
b=NfQv+Vij0cTW/MPXHvE5bnkyx3Imw00GETxiaREXYKtKR+28vBEzExPiiOx77mJrQF
kmuzTzr0v/sAcARfG/YiRlU/rJxJ4lbk12EAg/GylmXTBOAQ50viYhxaS9UV1Wj4s/80
vLd6UaIMiLwL7QE82ToIVoAn3kXkSspr+D+o/vbTyrZWdKI4CyvLTaIAqqTccym8K/T9
7AjOE3+bGg+GYEQsTY+LleR8yr0wqJ3wxr0d7lLYrXd0RTropeGt1IwFwL4gIsmH3DBp
wGFS2qxXgWYs4HC7WWyZi9vfVWleWyZ0KibzZRcUYn9yKNV4q8XLMYZbf8K9y+glecjx
MgIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm9D/keMOMHYadNYUgOMFSV0CjDlN/7PoMDjjw2EAjaY3FDb9QLooK14K8nvJlu0pmp9e9j
X-Received: by 10.220.202.9 with SMTP id fc9mr1499076vcb.40.1409591792183;
Mon, 01 Sep 2014 10:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.214.4 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 10:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [24.84.235.32]
In-Reply-To: <5404A3A3.9050506@cisco.com>
References: <CAHBU6iuxfqs9RszSaJLaTV_obKBCJ9Pzii+t9XANN3q+bJm-3Q@mail.gmail.com>
<5404A3A3.9050506@cisco.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 10:16:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHBU6ivHKRn_hNHxBHGHewMeeG1s_DhCc_5kV7hg=Um7ZH9jYw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1c3e00d40520502042a35
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/endymail/p2UNjuXqREoY7PpN5wrD7viZ434
Cc: endymail@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and what the IETF could do
X-BeenThere: endymail@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <endymail.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/endymail>,
<mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/endymail/>
List-Post: <mailto:endymail@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail>,
<mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:16:42 -0000
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote: > 1. Find a public key for the user that the sender’s prepared to trust. > ... > > If the IETF could solve but this problem such that it scales to the size of > the Internet, everything else on your list would I think fall into place. These days, I’m all excited about the keybase.io model. Since I’ve already held forth on this, let me just add that anyone who’s interested in a closer look, it’s in closed beta but I have loads of invites, shoot me an email and I’ll ask you in. NOTE: I haven’t developed an opinion yet about the actual keybase.io project itself because I don’t fully understand what they’re trying to be. But I find the model genuinely exciting. > Unfortunately, key management really wasn't on your list, and that has to be > addressed as well. Good point, I agree 100%. I’m aware of some mobile apps that are taking a seriously-good run at solving the UX part of the problem; obviously, that’s just as hard/important as the crypto and data security and so on. I’m starting to wonder if maybe hardware-based approaches along the lines of what the FIDO people are working on are the best approach: Your data is key is on your keychain; physically, in your pocket, right beside your house key. Also, I suspect that email programs probably need to > evolve a bit to cope with all of this. Case and point: I'm pretty sure I've > lot one or two private keys along the way. And, at least compared to your > average Joe, I'm good at this. > > BTW, it all has to happen without asking for matching keys. Enigmail does a > pretty good job of that already. That's a pretty good model for UI (I > hazard a guess), and so stay focused on how to get it to function to scale. > It may make sense to use some form of OTR for end-to-end transit. But again > I wouldn't want to count on OTR for data at rest. > > Eliot -- - Tim Bray (If you’d like to send me a private message, see https://keybase.io/timbray)
- [Endymail] Another view of the problem and what t… Tim Bray
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Werner Koch
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Tim Bray
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Werner Koch
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Werner Koch
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Steffen Nurpmeso
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Leo Vegoda
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Leo Vegoda
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Adam Caudill
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Tim Bray
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Werner Koch
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Werner Koch
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Michael Kjörling
- Re: [Endymail] Another view of the problem and wh… Leo Vegoda