IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Tue, 09 September 2014 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC051A802B for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 10:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pAx-KcWS2Vei for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 10:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22d.google.com (mail-qa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 939611A700B for <endymail@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 10:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id s7so727939qap.32 for <endymail@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 10:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I2LsXWq0A/U9WJOsd03MGAAP3QHzHok1In4iPM0swNc=; b=i9md/ynRZJl6NruqsXlwpSgbwfmK8y10k8p7Cf6hGVJ1yc3ZQn8jT6h5bEkRYuBr3q lJTlkco/I3h9kAwERHbNzIBdRIzU1suNL1/+fgctf/CQIi/ftIC8O/9MfzJKqvXyV8hb Rolaixb5HjetIT/xl+XaEnkcJ1z0UWqLvFDcAcLahuhBEdbSZ08o7RNN4WEp30dsfY6H EGb3V2/2wV9/xOShCCmcRKxPnTmptXgNucyWXD328EReUfuxggOYs3Aprwro/C8UcIiI 7ibU+zfxuGs87ZJvSxqiMwa2RXD2ygb4E0brb9LuFD/Dt7vm6RTfzzb+DggbIKbEHmiQ 5a3A==
X-Received: by 10.224.46.67 with SMTP id i3mr20422568qaf.90.1410284213631; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 10:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-8-156.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [76.218.8.156]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k52sm10310638qge.42.2014.09.09.10.36.52 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Sep 2014 10:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <540F39F2.1040801@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 10:33:38 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, endymail@ietf.org
References: <20140907170207.14888.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20140907170207.14888.qmail@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/endymail/tmG_MozXT6zb6Kb5KUWENjnGEuE
Cc: watsonbladd@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Endymail] spam versus cleartext
X-BeenThere: endymail@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <endymail.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/endymail/>
List-Post: <mailto:endymail@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 17:36:56 -0000

On 9/7/2014 10:02 AM, John Levine wrote:
> I don't know of anyone who does message
> rejection based on DKIM signatures


Google and Yahoo say that they use DKIM signatures as part of reputation
assessment.  That's distinct from any use of DMARC.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email