[Endymail] Off we go...
Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 26 August 2014 22:34 UTC
Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733521A004C for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ma9PRKqtXEEP for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA5AB1A008F for <endymail@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1409092479; x=1440628479; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:sender: content-transfer-encoding; bh=YVg1YTwuc9gBbi0p7LXnO+lrGbC1dKIEcPBvo7gnRGc=; b=zjvYlnzrJlwlYoZpVEJ3Ydxccr6yDybuC8tdCK2L+WCEqxLfeTyTNGUa Dcd46R4HCLsuUvTRHqqUadbZqhzD4Ahg6D9WOJkzktsuiny6AS7Uv+0HG laZLGD2dGoBZFtEBHM3YYIjEy2gVgOs+Zfv35I6YLtld8oY4lSjcUoWxO 8=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5600,1067,7542"; a="60681931"
Received: from ironmsg01-lv.qualcomm.com ([10.47.202.180]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 26 Aug 2014 15:34:39 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,406,1406617200"; d="scan'208";a="31158270"
Received: from nasanexhc04.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.17]) by ironmsg01-lv.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 26 Aug 2014 15:34:38 -0700
Received: from presnick-mac.local (172.30.48.1) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.181.6; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:34:38 -0700
Message-ID: <53FD0B7D.8070705@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:34:37 -0700
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: endymail@ietf.org
Sender: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.48.1]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/endymail/tv3V3-gB3X9Te2e9n0_cj78_Bvg
Subject: [Endymail] Off we go...
X-BeenThere: endymail@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <endymail.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/endymail/>
List-Post: <mailto:endymail@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 22:34:41 -0000
Hi all, We've got 88 people subscribed now, which is pretty quick for a list like this. Seems like there really is interest in the topic, which is good. What we'd suggest is to start off with some sharing about what folks are/have-been doing in this space. We know there are a range of projects and proposals and it'd be good to get some information/pointers on those we all know about. Its probably worth stating now that this list is *not* intended to pick a winner amongst those, nor to anoint one as the "official" IETF thing, so luckily we don't need to have a bunfight about which is the shiniest proposal of them all. :-) Rather a goal of this list is to identify bits of work that the IETF could do to help such projects/proposals so they could achieve significant deployment. So if there are common bits to some projects/proposals that'd be interesting and especially if there'd be value in having those bits standardized. Or if there are other ways in which we could help things along that's fair game for discussion too. And I suppose its inevitable that we'll discuss requirements and the real-world constraints on solutions too. And even get new and possibly radical proposals for how to do better in this space. And those are also OK and interesting for this list. Success here will be when/if we identify some bit(s) of work that the IETF could credibly do that'd improve the real-world end-to-end security and privacy of email. And note that "credible" there requires stuff to be both technically sane and to have a sufficient set of capable folks interested and willing to do work. When/if we do identify such, we'd probably want to start a new WG/list to actually do the work identified at which point this list could languish or continue on with more discussion of the next good thing(s) to do. So off we go... What projects are folks working on, and what should the IETF be doing in this space? Cheers, Pete & Stephen
- Re: [Endymail] Off we go... Michael Kjörling
- [Endymail] Off we go... Pete Resnick
- Re: [Endymail] Off we go... Tom Ritter
- Re: [Endymail] Off we go... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Off we go... Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- Re: [Endymail] Off we go... Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Endymail] Off we go... Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [Endymail] Off we go... Frank Li
- Re: [Endymail] Off we go... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Off we go... Leo Vegoda
- Re: [Endymail] Off we go... Werner Koch
- Re: [Endymail] Off we go... Adam Caudill