RE: [Entmib] Entity State MIB Status - DateAndTime Erratum

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> Fri, 23 July 2004 12:40 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA18090 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:40:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BnzGN-0000Vr-F8; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:34:59 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BnzAN-00060w-Vh for entmib@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:28:48 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA17276 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:28:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com ([192.11.222.161]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BnzB8-0005MA-He for entmib@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:29:35 -0400
Received: from nl0006exch001h.wins.lucent.com (h135-85-76-62.lucent.com [135.85.76.62]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6NCSBqD009307 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 07:28:12 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by nl0006exch001h.nl.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <NTS1CBKM>; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:28:11 +0200
Message-ID: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15504D06D27@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de, "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Subject: RE: [Entmib] Entity State MIB Status - DateAndTime Erratum
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:28:08 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c1c65599517f9ac32519d043c37c5336
Cc: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>, entmib@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: entmib-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-bounces@ietf.org

Why don't you send me the exact text for the erratum and I will 
feel the waters with IESG. 

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de]
> Sent: vrijdag 23 juli 2004 14:00
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Cc: Randy Presuhn; entmib@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Entmib] Entity State MIB Status - DateAndTime Erratum
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> 
> > I can agree with the erratum submission.
> 
> > However, this is not something we should just decide on the 
> EntMIB mailing
> > list or WG. It is wider. And it does change the spec. So 
> I'd like to at
> > least have IESG approval. The risk is that they may suggest 
> a 4 week IETF
> > Last Call to make sure we have IETF consensus. After all it 
> is a change
> > (in my view a well justified, accaptable, and apparently 
> used in practice)
> > to a full STD document.
> 
> So tell me what the procedure is to make it happen and then I 
> will make
> up a calculation how much of my time it will cost and then I 
> will decide
> whether I engage in this or just let things continue the way they are.
> 
> [It the costs of getting this erratum in place is close to publishing
>  an RFC on this subject, then I might conclude that other things are 
>  more important.]
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
> <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 
> 28725 Bremen, Germany
> 

_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib