RE: [Entmib] entstate-648 Wordsmith - various (I, J, K, L, M, N )

"Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortelnetworks.com> Thu, 16 December 2004 13:02 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA20052 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:02:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Cev6W-0002pv-1b; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 07:51:36 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Cev0c-0001vb-Jk for entmib@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 07:45:30 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA18766 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 07:45:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.57]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cev90-00087I-CD for entmib@ietf.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 07:54:13 -0500
Received: from zrtpd0jn.us.nortel.com (zrtpd0jn.us.nortel.com [47.140.202.35]) by zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id iBGCisf24457 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 07:44:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: by zrtpd0jn.us.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <YZAC7DRS>; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 07:44:55 -0500
Message-ID: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B4022400CC@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
From: "Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortelnetworks.com>
To: entmib@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Entmib] entstate-648 Wordsmith - various (I, J, K, L, M, N )
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 07:44:47 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c1c65599517f9ac32519d043c37c5336
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: entmib-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-bounces@ietf.org

hi

I had a typo. I meant this:

> When the 'value of underRepair' is set, the resource is currently 
> being repaired, which depending on the implementation, may make the 
> other values in this bit string not meaningful."

Sharon

-----Original Message-----
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:schoenw@iu-bremen.de] On Behalf Of
Juergen Schoenwaelder
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 6:22 AM
To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:5K50:EXCH]
Cc: entmib@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Entmib] entstate-648 Wordsmith - various (I, J, K, L, M, N )


On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 01:50:24PM -0500, Sharon Chisholm wrote:
 
> When the 'value of underRepair' is set, the resource is currently 
> being repaired, which depending on the implementation, may make the 
> other values in this bit string meaningful."

Something like "may make the other values in this bit string meaningful"
scares me a bit. Is there any way to find out whether the bits are
meaningful, other than knowing the object implementor and having a beer with
her?

What about this (although it does not change the general situation):

  When the 'value of underRepair' is set, the resource is
  currently being repaired. In this situation, it is 
  implementation specific whether the other values in this 
  bit string are meaningful.

(This just avoids the "make meaningful" phrase, which kind of 
 implies that before the transition into underRepair the bits 
 were not meaningful, which I think is not necessarily true.)

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany


_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib