RE: [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Tue, 09 December 2003 13:08 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA24715 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:08:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AThar-0004Yr-5B; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 08:08:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ATha4-0004Ll-6u for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 08:07:12 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA24685 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:06:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ATha3-0006td-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 08:07:11 -0500
Received: from tiere.net.avaya.com ([198.152.12.100]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ATha2-0006tZ-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 08:07:10 -0500
Received: from tiere.net.avaya.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiere.net.avaya.com (Switch-3.1.2/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id hB9D6VFo029196 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:06:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from IS0004AVEXU1.global.avaya.com (h135-64-105-51.avaya.com [135.64.105.51]) by tiere.net.avaya.com (Switch-3.1.2/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id hB9D6TFo029175 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:06:30 -0500 (EST)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 15:07:07 +0200
Message-ID: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F04259868@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
Thread-Topic: [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus
Thread-Index: AcO+NUH9R8p/gXTOSWynup8t0sa3swAH9FHw
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Syam Madanapalli <madanapalli@hotmail.com>, entmib@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Syam, Can you clarify what is IPv6-specific in the state model proposed by the Internet-Draft that you are referring to? Thanks and Regards, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: entmib-admin@ietf.org [mailto:entmib-admin@ietf.org]On > Behalf Of Syam Madanapalli > Sent: 09 December, 2003 11:14 AM > To: entmib@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus > > > I am wondering if the following draft brings any interest > for the Entity State MIB. > > State Model for IPv6 Interfaces > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-syam-ipv6-state-model-00.txt > > But this state model is only for IPv6 Interfaces whereas > Entity State MIB > covers every thing. > > Thank you, > Syam > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Juergen Schoenwaelder" <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de> > To: <Margaret.Wasserman@nokia.com> > Cc: <entmib@ietf.org> > Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 7:13 PM > Subject: Re: [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus > > > > On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 08:24:11AM -0500, > Margaret.Wasserman@nokia.com > wrote: > > > > > > During the meeting in Minneapolis, there was agreement > > > in the room on a few points, an dI'd like to confirm > > > that consensus on the mailing list. > > > > > > In particular, we reached agreement at the meeting on > > > the following points: > > > > > > - We will deprecate the Alias Mapping Table so that the Entity > > > MIB can advance to Draft Standard. > > > > Well, this is what it takes... > > > > > - Future extensions to the Entity MIB should be handled as > > > separate MIBs that augment the Entity MIB. > > > > Not sure how useful such a blanket statement is. > > > > > - The Entity State MIB is currently too complex and should be > > > simplified. > > > > I like to know what precisely people find too complex > before subscribing > > to such a blanket statement. Can someone please explain (and perhaps > > suggest what precisely needs to be removed)? > > > > /js > > > > -- > > Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen > > <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, > Germany > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Entmib mailing list > > Entmib@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib > > > > _______________________________________________ > Entmib mailing list > Entmib@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib > _______________________________________________ Entmib mailing list Entmib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
- Re: [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus Juergen Schoenwaelder
- [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus Margaret.Wasserman
- RE: [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- RE: [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus Sharon Chisholm
- Re: [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus Syam Madanapalli
- Re: [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus Juergen Schoenwaelder
- RE: [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Entmib] A state model.... David T. Perkins
- Re: [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus Syam Madanapalli
- Re: [Entmib] A state model.... Syam Madanapalli
- RE: [Entmib] Confirmming Meeting Consensus Margaret.Wasserman
- Re: [Entmib] A state model.... Keith McCloghrie