RE: [Entmib] #322 - Textual Convention Names (Prefix)

"Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortelnetworks.com> Thu, 25 March 2004 16:42 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA05838 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:42:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B6Xvd-0001w7-EI; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:42:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B6Xv7-0001v4-66 for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:41:29 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA05784 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:41:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B6Xv5-0005vC-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:41:27 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B6XuM-0005t1-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:40:42 -0500
Received: from zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.57]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B6Xtr-0005nG-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:40:11 -0500
Received: from zcard309.ca.nortel.com (zcard309.ca.nortel.com [47.129.242.69]) by zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id i2PGdec06735 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:39:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: by zcard309.ca.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <GXT6KDF6>; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:39:40 -0500
Message-ID: <3549C09B853DD5119B540002A52CDD340A9D3086@zcard0ka.ca.nortel.com>
From: "Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortelnetworks.com>
To: entmib@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Entmib] #322 - Textual Convention Names (Prefix)
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:39:39 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

hi

We had previously agreed that if these state objects were not specific to
physical entities then they should not have this prefix. We seem to be back
to not agreeing that they are specific to physical entities. 

I don't think they are and I don't think they should be. What specifically
about them do people view as being specific to physical entities?

Sharon

-----Original Message-----
From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 11:37 AM
To: David T. Perkins; Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH]; entmib@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Entmib] #322 - Textual Convention Names (Prefix)


> HI,
> 
> Tell me again why a prefix of "EntityPhys" doesn't work?
> 
That would work for me!

Bert

_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib